Archive 90 | ← | Archive 95 | Archive 96 | Archive 97 | Archive 98 | Archive 99 | Archive 100 |
Wikidata weekly summary #595
Women in Red October 2023
![]()
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
National Council of Women (Romania)
Hi Dsp13, thank you for your recent article creations on Romanian women. It turns out National Council of Women (Romania) already existed as Union of Antifascist Women of Romania, so I think a merge should be made. What do you think? Regards and keep the good work up. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 22:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing this! I'm very ignorant of Romanian history, and don't read Romanian, but it seems (e.g. from this English thesis and this French thesis) as if the PCR had three successive women's organizations - the Union of Anti-Fascist Women of Romania (1944-47), the Union of Democratic Women of Romania (1948-53) and the National Council of Women (1954-89). As well as having different names, they had some difference in structure. On the other hand, each succeeded the previous one as the Party's official women's organization. So I'm not sure myself whether it would be clearest to have one WP page (with a bunch of relevant redirects from the different names) or to have three. Dsp13 (talk) 23:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- A merger discussion could be started then. Hopefully it will attract some editors more knowledgeable on the topic, I myself don't know too much either. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 00:28, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- Good idea. Does that involve any more than putting the mergeto, mergefrom templates on the pages? Dsp13 (talk) 09:34, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- Also starting a thread on the talk page of the article supposed to receive the info so that it can be linked on the templates. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 09:47, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- Good idea. Does that involve any more than putting the mergeto, mergefrom templates on the pages? Dsp13 (talk) 09:34, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- A merger discussion could be started then. Hopefully it will attract some editors more knowledgeable on the topic, I myself don't know too much either. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 00:28, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Hallo, I tweaked your entry in the list to split your signature out into the "participants" list, to standardise - hope that's OK by you. PamD 11:22, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! I realised when I added it that I didn't know the standard format. Well done on scoring a three-in-one! (And I can't easily imagine what it would be like to be one of 25 children.) Dsp13 (talk) 11:48, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #596
Wikidata weekly summary #597
Wikidata weekly summary #598
Nomination of Samantha Woll for deletion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c1e4/7c1e48f4faebb0ffdf3780546b753e70aff51a4d" alt=""
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Woll until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Stephen 22:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #599
Women in Red - November 2023
![]()
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging