• Preserve
• Articles I started
• Checking

Thank you Cactus, for your guidance in creating a new category! Thanks! :) SunnyBoi (talk) 07:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SunnyBoi, Thanks!! — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 07:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Remsense was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NACTOR. It is demonstrated that she has had several roles in notable works, but not that they were major roles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mademoiselle Mante and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Remsense ‥ 论 09:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cactusisme! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Remsense ‥ 论 09:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense, I pretty sure she is notable and she played a few major roles in some of the films — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 11:31, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Citations to more than one dictionary would help very much to establish that fact. Remsense ‥ 论 11:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense, dictionary? — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 11:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this? — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 11:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm referring to the single dictionary you have cited in the article. Remsense ‥ 论 11:41, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense, https://lesarchivesduspectacle.net/s/71294-Mademoiselle-de-Belle-Isle — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 11:49, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason the redirect got declined was because a user named Nmammad vandalized it. I don't think it was a fair decline. Kjjj6uhhhhh (talk) 16:45, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kjjj6uhhhhh, I will take a look again — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 03:09, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kjjj6uhhhhh, It still seem to be an unlikely search term? — Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 03:33, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justiyaya was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

no secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keppel Coastal Trail and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justiyaya 04:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bulbinella rossii on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]