Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wonderland (Taylor Swift song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 11:45, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wonderland (Taylor Swift song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wonderland (Taylor Swift song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Wonderland (Taylor Swift song)/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 07:42, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Brachy! I've made some copyedits for further polishing, but the article looks pretty good anyways :)) Medxvo (talk) 12:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks med =D brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 12:56, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. BTW, you forgot to sign (~~~~) your post at Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/1989 (album)/addition5, don't forget to sign it before adding the nom at WP:GTC, and thanks for the kind words there! :) Medxvo (talk) 13:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no problem :) +

 Self-trout brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 23:27, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

out on scratch somewhere in february brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 13:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brachy, I hope you're doing well! Just wanted to ask if you would like to review my Christmas Tree Farm FAC? :) It's not getting much traction and it would definitely benefit from your helpful insights. Medxvo (talk) 17:45, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i would love to do so :) brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 23:41, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! Medxvo (talk) 05:08, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brachy0008. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Loml".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:42, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Brachy, thanks for your tips on the Aries page I'm creating. I saw this was the link to chat with you. I have added a chart positon for Aries album on the Billboard 200 as I saw that having a single or album in a national music chart is a criteria for notability. I can't seem to figure out how to format that in the way that other artists have on their page like Keshi (singer) for example where there's a separate box for US below peak chart positions. Do you know how I can do that?

Hopefully this is enough notability for Aries to be approved. Aries is a notable artist that has had tours where other artists that have Wikipedia pages have been supporting him such as Brakence and Verzache. You can see here - https://www.instagram.com/aries/p/CVgNejTviBk/ .

I see Verzache's page for example doesn't have any major label albums or chart positions and is approved.

I'm not sure why 3 references are showing in early life and not in the main reference list. How can I fix that?

Also what sources are unreliable? I'd love to fix whatever's needed to get this approved.

What else do I also need to clean up? Is that something I do or does it go through to a moderator to do that?

Thank you for the help!

Wikiguru19 (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

well, since you have proved that aries got an album into the billboard 200, which is a notable chart, passing one criteria in WP:MUSICBIO. it should be notable. i kinda found the problem about the three sources and fixed it for you, but for now, i think it can pass. that's just me. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 03:42, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks for the feedback and thanks for fixing those sources. Much appreciated. What are the next steps to get it approved and live? Do I need to resubmit it? Wikiguru19 (talk) 05:30, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just resubmitted FYI. Let me know if there's anything else I should do! Are you the one that approves it to go live or is that someone else? Wikiguru19 (talk) 05:34, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you can do as much research on aries as possible. but be sure to check WP:ALBUMSOURCES and WP:RSP. it should help with sourcing but yeah the article should be good to go. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 06:57, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok great thanks very much! Will do. I see it's live now that's great :)

Do you know how I can update the Discography chart so it looks like the one under studio albums here - Olivia Dean. So it has peak chart positions then the country's box underneath. Rather than having the country in parenthesis like Aries page currently. I just think it would look cleaner and more like other Wikipedia pages look.

Also do you know how I can remove the empty small square boxes that show on Aries public page now? At the bottom left under the career text there's one small empty square box. Then under the discography chart at the bottom left there's 2 small empty square boxes Wikiguru19 (talk) 01:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ill try my best to clean the article up. ;D brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 02:40, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you you're the best!! Wikiguru19 (talk) 02:41, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no problem ;D brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 02:44, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of interest how long does it normally take for a Wikipedia page to reach the top of the Google search rankings? I tried search 'Aries musician' on Google but it isn't showing yet Wikiguru19 (talk) 18:43, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i honestly don’t know but if i had to take a guess, it depends on how many people view the article. you can try submitting him for WP:DYK to boost some pageviews but you might want to dig deep to find something interesting about him. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 23:41, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The first round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As a reminder, we are no longer disqualifying the lowest-scoring contestants; everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned from Wikipedia. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. Unlike the round points in the main WikiCup table, which are reset at the end of each round, tournament points are carried over between rounds and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far.

Round 1 was very competitive compared with previous years; two contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 500 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,168 round points, mainly from 4 featured articles and 4 good articles on old military history, in addition to an assortment of GA and FA reviews.
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, mainly from 2 FAs, 2 featured lists, 8 GAs, and 16 Did You Know articles mainly on historical topics.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions), with 866 round points from 20 GAs, 23 DYKs, and 2 In the News articles primarily about athletes.
• Sammi Brie (submissions), with 846 round points from 16 GAs about radio and TV stations, 45 GA reviews, and 3 DYKs.
• Hey man im josh (submissions), with 816 round points from 5 FLs about sports and Olympic topics, 46 FL reviews, 3 ITN articles, and a large number of bonus points.
• MaranoFan (submissions), with 815 round points primarily from 3 FAs and 1 GA about music, in addition to 9 article reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 18 featured articles, 26 featured lists, 1 featured-topic article, 197 good articles, 38 good-topic articles and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 23 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 550 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2, which begins on 1 March. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]