Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

You recently reverted my edit with a summary of "No reason to artificially restrict the size of the tables within the article. On large displays it just creates excessive scrolling. If the sticky headers are causing issues then it would be simpler to just remove them outright, rather than replacing them with a fix that is inferior for the vast majority of readers." Just so you are aware, the majority uses mobile per User Agent Breakdowns, which is where the sticky headers are mostly needed for very tall/wide tables. I'm glad you are fixing it. Please also fix the screen reader accessibility issues per MOS:COLHEAD. Also, if you want sticky headers without the scroll, you can use Template:Sticky header. Jroberson108 (talk) 04:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The scroll table is restrictive on both large and small displays. Without the scroll table I can see five full rows on my phone, but with it I can only see three rows and have to scroll to see the final two columns, and it is also fiddly to scroll through. I am not particularly bothered about the sticky headers—they were only added a few months ago, and the article survived for years without them. They are mostly a gimmick where the data in the table is intuitive and take up valuable screen space on small devices. Betty Logan (talk) 05:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd appreciate you pinging me in your reply as I am not subscribed to your talk page. Don't forget that there is also landscape orientation. I mentioned an alternative to the scroll, so use either one if you want sticky headers. Sticky headers with or without the scroll have their uses on small screens, especially for very tall tables. When scrolling down to read data, instead of having to continuously scroll up and down to read forgettable headers to associate with the data, the headers stay in view. You are welcome to your opinion, so use it or don't. If you feel the table has memorable headers and isn't "very" tall, then remove the sticky headers once you test it on mobile in both orientations. It's not about survival, but improving accessibility for others. Please also fix what sounds like a long standing MOS:COLHEAD accessibility issue. Jroberson108 (talk) 05:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's your problem? You haven't even seen the movie to be sabotaging what I do. And I'm not going to insist on breaking the rules. I only ask one thing of you: leave me alone. JeanMercier90 (talk) 02:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am required to leave a warning on your talk page as a precursor to reporting you for edit-warring. Betty Logan (talk) 03:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	A very happy Christmas and New Year to you!
	Have a great Christmas, and may 2025 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls or vandals! Cheers SchroCat (talk) 08:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Schro, you have a good one too. Betty Logan (talk) 20:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

★Trekker (talk) 08:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Princess Mononoke § Casting details. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:50, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's also Talk:Princess Mononoke#About the rewrite of the plot summary if you're interested. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 13:24, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spirited Away has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:01, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UNDO: It is also possible to undo several consecutive edits, even if they conflict among themselves: view the "diff" to be removed (by selecting the earliest and most recent revisions in the history and clicking "compare selected revisions"), and click the "undo" link.

You also might want to ask for WP:ROLLBACK rights, it occasionally comes in handy. Happy editing! Paradoctor (talk) 20:21, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you removed the poster caption I put on The article for that movie. I may not have linked it correctly (I admittedly don’t know how to do that), but I do believe you removed it validly. You said it doesn’t matter who did the poster, but the purpose of Wikipedia is to spread information, and who did a movie poster is certainly notable information. I respectfully ask you to look on the Wikipedia pages of a number popular movies with illustrated posters, and you’ll see illustrators like McGinty, John Alvin, Saul Bass, And Drew Struzan credited in the poster caption.

Please, don’t become the next SeaSider53.

I wish you the best of luck in your future edits,

The Denton Dossier. The Denton Dossier (talk) 16:57, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]