The Content Creativity Barnstar

The Content Creativity Barnstar
For your efforts to give a "Pelikan" his wings by creating the articles for '90s Super GP and The TakeOver, I bequeath unto thee this award. BOTTO (TC) 02:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon Stadium

This is probably a super random query, but I figured I'd ask. I'm working on improving articles related to Pokémon Stadium (Pocket Monsters' Stadium and Pokémon Stadium are both GANs, and I plan to hit up Pokémon Stadium 2 in the future) and am considering a potential GT. However, I am a bit concerned that a series article may derail plans a bit, as I would need to work on that too. I have performed a search and could not find enough content for a series article per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Video games's criteria. All I got were Wikipedia:VALNET hits, which aren't helpful for obvious reasons.

You've managed to scrounge up obscure sources a lot better than I have in the past, and have additionally contributed to the creation of many series articles in the past as well. Would you be willing to take a look and see if this article is possible? Feel free to decline if you're busy or don't want to, but I figured I'd ask you as one last effort before I call it quits on trying to see if coverage exists for this. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 21:27, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I can find very little either besides Valnet. Print only has trivial mentions too. I think it's safe to say that Pokemon Stadium will probably not merit a series article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 21:55, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, that's a shame. Still, thank you so much for the help. It's greatly appreciated :) Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:25, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Misericorde Volume One screenshot.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Misericorde Volume One screenshot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука13 08:09, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Zxcvbnm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Penny Arcade's On the Rain-Slick Precipice of Darkness 3 and 4, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've been going through and trying to compile sourcing on which Overwatch characters could be viably spun out from the character list, and I do think a viable avenue could be considered for Bastion. Mentioning this as a courtesy because you had initially AfD'd it, but looking at the sources on my sandbox while a good bit is about gameplay, I think I can frame it in a way that illustrates the character as an examination of their game mechanics, especially with the PC Gamer sources that does a deep dive comparing him to TF2's engineer. Additionally, there's the PTSD angle also, which both Fanbyte and player.one (a Newsweek owned source) go into depth on.

Do you think this could be more viable with that considered? Kung Fu Man (talk) 13:13, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hidden City: Hidden Object Adventure

Hello, Zxcvbnm.

Sorry for bothering, but I wanted to reach out as this is my first article: Draft:Hidden_City:_Hidden_Object_Adventure. You left a message: "Not seeing sufficient reviews to pass WP:GNG here." Could you kindly clarify if there are any reliable references in my list that could be used? Additionally, could you let me know how many good references are typically needed to pass the review? I frankly thought that the references I have are a good start for publishing the article.

Thank you for your assistance! DaniKro (talk) 07:59, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ask.com review doesn't count towards being an RS due to being AI generated. Most of the other ones are either unreliable or simply mention the game as a trivial mention. Usually, something like Metacritic is the place to go to search for significant coverage, but in this case it has very few reviews besides Softonic, which just isn't enough. Usually about 3 are needed. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 15:39, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No tags for this post.