Good articleRed fox has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 2, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
September 28, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 2, 2004.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that four different continents host red fox populations?
Current status: Good article

New fox species

I'm highly concerned that there is another Fox species in the horn of Africa maybe there is a Somali fox species because animals don't have passports and don't have borders and every day we're discovering a new species and foxes are very resilient since they can survive blazing deserts and freezing tundras so there can be a chance of a new fox species 2001:8F8:1425:CE51:3172:A0C1:5E30:4B86 (talk) 13:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

wait does that mean that they would be able to evolve to be able to live in a crowded city? or is it that food would be to scarce to where they would just leave even if they mutated Davidbobwinski5432 (talk) 13:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Red Fox Native Range Map

I would suggest that the Red Foxs' presence in the South East United States should not be considered natural, nor its status native as indicated on the map in the sidebar. Coyotes experienced a similar range expansion into the South East and yet are not generally considered native.

QuickbeamForester (talk) 00:38, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers of annually killed foxes

in chapter 'Hunting': This looks like there is one "0" too many in the number for Germany, doesn't it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:3033:60D:1A87:3DA3:9D5C:372E:CA07 (talk)

It is correct per the given reference. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:46, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actual range

Originally the sentence read "It is absent in Greenland, Iceland, the Arctic islands, the most northern parts of central Siberia, and in extreme deserts." and was referenced to https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/23062/193903628#geographic-range. However, that source says that it is found in Greenland and Iceland so I've removed that. At the same time the source clearly states that they are not found on Arctic islands. Yet the map in the source clearly shows that Baffin Island, a well known Arctic island, is part of their range. Additionally, https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/103/3/586/6516595 says that they are to be found on Bylot Island and Herschel Island, both Arctic islands (https://nunatsiaq.com/stories/article/iqaluit-residents-report-run-ins-with-foxes/ contains a picture by one of the researchers taken on Bylot). So what is the actual range?

What caught my attention was that I have seen both red and silver foxes Silver fox (animal) on Victoria Island in the Ulukhaktok, but that's just anecdotal. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:12, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No tags for this post.