This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Paranormal This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Russia: Science & education / Mass media Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force. This article is supported by the mass media in Russia task force. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women Skepticism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Dreadstar, I'm not sure how this stuff works, but it looks to me like this edit of yours has set Miszabot to archive this page pretty aggressively (archiving threads more than 7 days old). Is that it? If so, what for? That's the way blindingly busy talkpages like Talk:William Shakespeare are archived. The slow-moving talkpages of obscure pages like Natasha Demkina will normally be archived by hand, when they get too long to load easily. Currently, this page covers discussion back to 2007, and it's still not particularly long! Surely it's useful for newer editors to have easy access to earlier discussions right on the page itself, so they don't have to keep re-inventing the wheel? I have only slightly edited your template (fixing a typo). Perhaps it has a purpose I don't understand. But if I'm right about what it does, I would ask you to remove it. Bishonen | talk 15:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Hey Bish, thanks for fixing the typo in the mizabot configuration. The aggressive timing was only a temporarily setting meant to quickly archive the very old sections going back to 2007; I planned to increase the length of time after the first pass. I've gone ahead and changed it to 90 days instead of a week. Hopefully that's satisfactory for everyone! Dreadstar ☥ 17:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thanks. Bishonen | talk 18:24, 19 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]

The text in the lead Center of Special Diagnostics of the Natalya Demkina (TSSD) is clearly the product of a translation tool. I'm not competent to do a better job, but I suggest Demkina Center of Special Diagnostics (TSSD). From the initials it's hard to see where Natalya comes in. Spicemix (talk) 19:59, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, this awkward wording STILL has not been fixed by some-one who is competent. Please help! Kdammers (talk) 05:42, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to the newspapers (http://www.kp.ru/daily/23641/48779/) back in 2006 she was working for the Center of special human diagnostics (Russian: Центр специальной диагностики человека), perhaps still existing in Moscow. But for sure it was not hers. Maybe someone will settle the problem? Igor Makhankov (talk) 08:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"The Tokyo test was reviewed by three Japanese experts: the occult critic Hajime Yuumu, the psychologist Hiroyuki Ishii, and the Tondemo-bon Society skeptic Hiroshi Yamamoto. The results of Dr. Machi's tests and a panel discussion by the three critics aired on Fuji Television on May 12, 2005." So, what were their takes? Kdammers (talk) 05:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bshjsjrjr 46.106.174.142 (talk) 14:43, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]