This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance). Internet Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Telecommunications Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. IRC (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject IRC, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.IRCWikipedia:WikiProject IRCTemplate:WikiProject IRCIRC

Could at least one table, preferably the first, have a column for supported protocols for each client? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.208.233.139 (talk) 08:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible to have a table comparing the principal monitisation strategy and the major funding source, behind each service? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elcaba (talk • contribs) 14:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion: No. That is info that belongs on the page of the packages itself. The Banner talk 15:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've found references to snikket here: https://neilzone.co.uk/2023/07/snikket-a-self-contained-xmpp-distribution/ with the official site here: https://snikket.org/

Does it deserve a page and/or belong in the list?

ArthurDent006.5 (talk) 08:59, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The standard advice is to write the article first. The Banner talk 13:15, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]