This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lighthouses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lighthouses and other water navigational aids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LighthousesWikipedia:WikiProject LighthousesTemplate:WikiProject LighthousesLighthouses
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Move is being requested due to the fact the USCG and USFS refer to this light as a Light not Lighthouse as they do all active US lightstations. [1]Gateman199720:07, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not so sure...the website of the Trustees of Reservations (the foundation that maintains the lighthouse) shows that it is called Cape Poge Lighthouse. See for yourself:
[2] With a search containing lighthouse, you can see that Cape Poge Lighthouse is used many times in that order.
[3] With a search containing light, the only time the word light is used is not even close to the words Cape and Poge.
In this instance however the foundation that works to make the light pretty is secondary to the entity that owns and operates it which is the US Government through the auspices of the US Coast Guard (and previously the US Lighthouse service). The Coast Guard and official governament name is Cape Poge Light. Also common name would apply here and Cape Poge Light produces 1750 Google hits while Cape Poge Lighthouse only produces 818.Gateman199723:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I guess I see your point. If you can find a few other reputible sources that call it the Cape Poge Light, then you can change it. I just think that the trustees of reservation is just as reputible, though. →J@redtalkubx23:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll look around, however I don't think any sources are more reputable then two departments of the US gov't. (As long as it's not homeland security ;) )Gateman199702:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Must be because I used Yahoo instead of Google. Either way however the official name is Cape Poge Light, that is indisputable. Shouldn't the article reside at the official name?Gateman199720:52, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In this case it makes little difference to me, so long as there are redirects in place. Speaking stricly for myself, I'd always refer to such structures as lighthouses, and most of the ones in Michigan are generally described that way. I'm not familiar with this one or typical usage in MA. I guess it depends a little on perspective, most tourists and shutterbugs are more interested in the structure housing the light and would likely refer to it as a lighthouse. From a nautical perspective (the USCG), it's the light itself that is more important. older ≠ wiser21:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
All right, Gateman, I'll give this one to you, because it doesn't really matter to me that much anyway. But I visit the Vineyard often, so if I ever get a chance to go to the Lighthouse and there's an inscription or plaque somewhere showing the real name, I'll make sure to tell you and change it accordingly. For now, it seems reasonible to move it. →J@redtalkubx21:52, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.