This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Websites: Computing Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. Internet culture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention Blogging (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging Transhumanism Low‑importance LessWrong' is part of WikiProject Transhumanism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide Transhumanism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.TranshumanismWikipedia:WikiProject TranshumanismTemplate:WikiProject TranshumanismTranshumanism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. For more information and how you can help click Show: If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details. Quick help: Main talk page Article layout Links to Transhumanism information and Wikipedia:Research resources Writing about religion and Article development Citing sources, Verifying sources and Original research Assume good faith and be civil See changes to: Core articles Transhumanism article New Transhumanism articles To Do List: - history - watch - purge Join WikiProject transhumanism and be bold Show off a userbox with {{userWPA}} or {{userWPA2}} and attract potential members Help with articles. See this month's adopt an article. Help out with the To-do lists Be consistent Use a "standard" layout for transhumanism related articles (see: The perfect article, and Featured articles) Add Transhumanism navigation template on the bottom of all transhumanism articles; (use {{Transhumanism}} or see navigation template) Add Transhumanism info box to all transhumanism related talk pages (use {{Wpa}} or see info box) Add [[Category:transhumanism]] to the bottom of all transhumanism related articles, so it shows up on the list of transhumanism articles Maintenance / Etc Find/cite sources for all positions of an article (see citing sources. Try to expand stubs, however, some "new" articles may be neologisms, as this is common with positions on theories on life and may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process) Watch the list of transhumanism related articles and add to accordingly (see transhumanism articles) And always write for an encyclopedia. Create Notable transhumanist articles Shorten / merge into others Expand a transhumanism stub Your immediate attention false choice into false dilemma - discuss whether you are for or against this merge here Clarify references in Transhumanism, using footnotes. Alternative views Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Skepticism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Effective Altruism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Effective Altruism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relevant to effective altruism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Effective AltruismWikipedia:WikiProject Effective AltruismTemplate:WikiProject Effective AltruismEffective Altruism Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

It looks like someone archives the previous discussion on neoreaction, making the cross-discussion hard to follow, but I want to continue the previous discussion where I was saying that there's no reason to mention Curvis here (it seems he posted a total of one (1) comment in 2007 on Overcoming Bias even before it was LessWgong, and even that comment didn't generate much discussion. @Getnormality seemed to agree (no-one objected), so I'll go ahead and edit. Flammifer (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, there was also mention of Hanson's debate with Moldbug, but that happened in May 2009, so after LessWrong was split from Overcoming Bias (February 2009), so, doesn't really seem relevant either? I removed it as well.

There are probably other ways to reformulate the intro to that section, I considered leaving " The comment section of Overcoming Bias attracted prominent neoreactionaries" (but without the example of Moldbug), but that seems both a) unsourced (the source only mentioned moldbug, whose contribution hardly seems notable) and b) not really important or relevant, even if it was sourced, but if someone can find a better way to reformulate that, go ahead. Flammifer (talk) 22:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Separate from rationalism. Andrew Keenan Richardson (talk!) 19:31, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

THis article is not about rationalism. Slatersteven (talk) 19:41, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There has already been a bold attempt to convert the redirect at Rationalist community into a new article, but standalone topic notability has not been clearly established. WeyerStudentOfAgrippa (talk) 13:57, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article could use a lot of work, but in particular I think that we should bring up the Zizians under "Notable users". I tried to make this change myself, but it was reverted. Should we find additional sources and try to make it a longer section? 35.145.156.193 (talk) 04:53, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Find good sources first for the claim they are notable users. Slatersteven (talk) 12:53, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, your most recent reversion was not the controversial part, just a formatting change (making LessWrong consistently italicized) by the same user that had been caught up with the part that needed citations.

I suppose strictly speaking it was part of a BRD cycle, but I think it’s uncontroversial? I’ll leave it undone for now though to be safe. Gbear605 (talk) 14:19, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]