m →Ships in class: italics |
copyedit |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{|{{Infobox ship begin}} |
{|{{Infobox ship begin}} |
||
{{Infobox ship image |
{{Infobox ship image |
||
|Ship image=[[ |
|Ship image=[[File:USS Bainbridge DD-1-650px.jpg|300px|USS Bainbridge]] |
||
|Ship caption=USS ''Bainbridge'' |
|Ship caption=USS ''Bainbridge'' |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Infobox ship class overview |
{{Infobox ship class overview |
||
|Name= |
|Name=''Bainbridge'' class |
||
|Builders=Various |
|Builders=Various |
||
|Operators= {{navy|US}} |
|Operators= {{navy|US}} |
||
|Class before=None |
|Class before=None |
||
|Class after={{sclass|Truxtun|destroyer| |
|Class after={{sclass-|Truxtun|destroyer|4}} |
||
|Subclasses=*''Hopkins'' |
|Subclasses=*''Hopkins'' |
||
*''Lawrence'' |
*''Lawrence'' |
||
*''Paul Jones'' |
*''Paul Jones'' |
||
*''Stewart'' |
*''Stewart'' |
||
|Built range=1899–1903 |
|Built range=1899–1903 |
||
|In commission range=1902–1919 |
|In commission range=1902–1919 |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|Total ships lost=1 |
|Total ships lost=1 |
||
|Total ships retired=12 |
|Total ships retired=12 |
||
|Total ships preserved= |
|Total ships preserved= |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Infobox ship characteristics |
{{Infobox ship characteristics |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
|Ship sensors= |
|Ship sensors= |
||
|Ship EW= |
|Ship EW= |
||
|Ship armament=* |
|Ship armament=*2 x [[3"/50 caliber gun|{{convert|3|in|mm|abbr=on|0}}/50 caliber]] guns |
||
* |
*5 x [[QF 6 pounder Hotchkiss|6 pounder]] (57 mm) guns |
||
* |
*2 x {{convert|18|in|mm|abbr=on|0}} [[torpedo tube]]s, four [[torpedo]]es |
||
|Ship armor= |
|Ship armor= |
||
|Ship notes= |
|Ship notes= |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
==Subclasses== |
==Subclasses== |
||
Some sources subdivide the ''Bainbridge'' class into additional classes.<ref>[http://destroyerhistory.org/early/first/ DestroyerHistory.org First US destroyers]</ref><ref>[http://www.destroyers.org/Class/cl-main.htm Tin Can Sailors @ Destroyers.org - Destroyer classes]</ref><ref name=Conways1>Gardiner and Chesneau, pp. 157-158</ref> |
Some sources subdivide the ''Bainbridge'' class into additional classes.<ref>[http://destroyerhistory.org/early/first/ DestroyerHistory.org First US destroyers]</ref><ref>[http://www.destroyers.org/Class/cl-main.htm Tin Can Sailors @ Destroyers.org - Destroyer classes]</ref><ref name=Conways1>Gardiner and Chesneau, pp. 157-158</ref> |
||
* ''Hopkins'' and ''Hull'' had a turtledeck forward and may be considered to be ''Hopkins'' |
* ''Hopkins'' and ''Hull'' had a turtledeck forward and may be considered to be ''Hopkins'' class. These had their two single torpedo tubes replaced by two twin torpedo tubes during World War I; total torpedoes remained at four.<ref name=Conways1/><ref name="Register"/> |
||
* ''Lawrence'' and ''Macdonough'' had a turtledeck forward, [[Fore River Shipyard|Fore River]] boilers, carried their funnels in only one group of four, and may be considered to be ''Lawrence'' |
* ''Lawrence'' and ''Macdonough'' had a turtledeck forward, [[Fore River Shipyard|Fore River]] boilers, carried their funnels in only one group of four, and may be considered to be ''Lawrence'' class. In 1906 two additional 6-pounder guns were substituted for the two 3-inch guns to save weight.<ref name="Register"/> |
||
* ''Paul Jones'', ''Perry'' and ''Preble'' carried one twin torpedo tube instead of two singles beginning in World War I and may be considered to be ''Paul Jones'' |
* ''Paul Jones'', ''Perry'' and ''Preble'' carried one twin torpedo tube instead of two singles beginning in World War I and may be considered to be ''Paul Jones'' class.<ref name=Conways1/> |
||
* ''Stewart'' was equipped with [[Gas Engine & Power Company & Charles L. Seabury Company|Seabury]] boilers and was the fastest of the 400-tonners on trials at {{convert|29.7|kn|lk=in}}, but her trial displacement of {{convert|444|LT|t|0|abbr=on}} is described as unrealistically light.<ref name="Register">Bauer and Roberts, p. 168</ref><ref name=Friedman1>Friedman, pp. 9-19, 452-453</ref> |
* ''Stewart'' was equipped with [[Gas Engine & Power Company & Charles L. Seabury Company|Seabury]] boilers and was the fastest of the 400-tonners on trials at {{convert|29.7|kn|lk=in}}, but her trial displacement of {{convert|444|LT|t|0|abbr=on}} is described as unrealistically light.<ref name="Register">Bauer and Roberts, p. 168</ref><ref name=Friedman1>Friedman, pp. 9-19, 452-453</ref> |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
Some references, including contemporary ones, describe four ocean-going torpedo boats launched in 1898-1899 as the first US destroyers based on their tonnage, which ranged from 235 tons to 340 tons. These were {{USS|Farragut|TB-11|2}}, {{USS|Stringham|TB-19|2}}, {{USS|Goldsborough|TB-20|2}}, and {{USS|Bailey|TB-21|2}}. ''Stringham'', the largest of these, was larger than some contemporary [[Royal Navy|British]] destroyers.<ref>Gardiner and Chesneau, pp. 90-94, 157-158</ref><ref name=Friedman1/> However, at 420 tons the ''Bainbridge''s were considerably larger and had a significantly greater gun armament than the four 6-pounders of the torpedo boats. |
Some references, including contemporary ones, describe four ocean-going torpedo boats launched in 1898-1899 as the first US destroyers based on their tonnage, which ranged from 235 tons to 340 tons. These were {{USS|Farragut|TB-11|2}}, {{USS|Stringham|TB-19|2}}, {{USS|Goldsborough|TB-20|2}}, and {{USS|Bailey|TB-21|2}}. ''Stringham'', the largest of these, was larger than some contemporary [[Royal Navy|British]] destroyers.<ref>Gardiner and Chesneau, pp. 90-94, 157-158</ref><ref name=Friedman1/> However, at 420 tons the ''Bainbridge''s were considerably larger and had a significantly greater gun armament than the four 6-pounders of the torpedo boats. |
||
The ''Bainbridge |
The ''Bainbridge'' class were produced on the recommendation of an 1898 war plans board formed to prosecute the [[Spanish–American War]] and chaired by [[Assistant Secretary of the Navy]] [[Theodore Roosevelt]]. The poor sea-keeping qualities of existing torpedo boats (such as the 165-ton {{USS|Porter|TB-6}}) and the existence of Spanish torpedo boat destroyers (such as the 370-ton {{ship|Spanish destroyer|Furor||2}}) were cited as reasons for the US to build its own destroyers.<ref name=Friedman1/> |
||
Due to construction difficulties the ''Bainbridge''s were completed 1901–02, thus too late for the Spanish–American War.<ref name=Friedman1/> However, the destroyer type was instituted in the US Navy, as it had been in the British [[Royal Navy]] around 1895 with the [[A-class destroyer (1913)|A-class destroyer]]s. No further torpedo boats were constructed for the US Navy until the outbreak of [[World War II]] in Europe, and by then they had no design relationship to destroyers (see [[PT boat]]s). It should be noted that the [[Imperial German Navy]] of 1898–1918 used the term "torpedo boat" for anything up to a large destroyer in size. |
Due to construction difficulties the ''Bainbridge''s were completed 1901–02, thus too late for the Spanish–American War.<ref name=Friedman1/> However, the destroyer type was instituted in the US Navy, as it had been in the British [[Royal Navy]] around 1895 with the [[A-class destroyer (1913)|A-class destroyer]]s. No further torpedo boats were constructed for the US Navy until the outbreak of [[World War II]] in Europe, and by then they had no design relationship to destroyers (see [[PT boat]]s). It should be noted that the [[Imperial German Navy]] of 1898–1918 used the term "torpedo boat" for anything up to a large destroyer in size. |
||
===Armament=== |
===Armament=== |
||
At 420 tons normal displacement, the ''Bainbridge''s were twice as big as most previous torpedo boats. The extra displacement was used for a greatly increased gun armament and a sufficient engineering plant to rival the torpedo boats in speed (28 |
At 420 tons normal displacement, the ''Bainbridge''s were twice as big as most previous torpedo boats. The extra displacement was used for a greatly increased gun armament and a sufficient engineering plant to rival the torpedo boats in speed ({{convert|28|kn|abbr=on}} vs. {{convert|29|kn|abbr=on}}).<ref name=Friedman1/> The torpedo armament remained at two {{convert|18|in|mm|adj=on|0}} [[torpedo tube]]s; although the torpedo boat's mission was being transferred to the destroyer, apparently increased gun armament was more important to the designers than increased torpedo armament.<ref>[http://www.history.navy.mil/museums/keyport/html/part2.htm US Navy Torpedo History, part 2]</ref> |
||
The gun armament of two [[3"/50 caliber gun|3 |
The gun armament of two [[3"/50 caliber gun|{{convert|3|in|mm|abbr=on|0}}/50 caliber]] guns and five [[QF 6 pounder Hotchkiss#American service|6-pounder]] ({{convert|57|mm|in|abbr=on|order=flip}}) guns was a great increase over the four 6-pounder guns of the torpedo boat {{USS|Farragut|TB-11|2}}.<ref>[http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_3-50_mk2.htm DiGiulian, Tony 3"/50 Mk 2 at NavWeaps.com]</ref><ref>[http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_6pounder_m1.htm DiGiulian, Tony 6 pdr Mk 1 at NavWeaps.com]</ref> It reflected a desire to quickly disable torpedo boats before they could get within range of friendly [[battleship]]s. Future destroyer classes included progressive increases in armament. |
||
The class was equipped with one or two [[depth charge]] racks during |
The class was equipped with one or two [[depth charge]] racks during World War I for the [[anti-submarine warfare|anti-submarine]] mission.<ref>Friedman, p. 68</ref> |
||
===Engineering=== |
===Engineering=== |
||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
''Lawrence'' had four [[Normand boiler]]s supplying steam to two [[triple-expansion engine]]s totaling {{convert|8,400|ihp|kW|lk=on|abbr=on}} (design).<ref name=Conways1/> She made {{convert|28.41|kn|mph km/h|lk=in|abbr=on|1}} on trials at {{convert|8,400|ihp|kW|lk=on|abbr=on}}. Normal coal capacity was 115 tons.<ref name=Friedman1/> |
''Lawrence'' had four [[Normand boiler]]s supplying steam to two [[triple-expansion engine]]s totaling {{convert|8,400|ihp|kW|lk=on|abbr=on}} (design).<ref name=Conways1/> She made {{convert|28.41|kn|mph km/h|lk=in|abbr=on|1}} on trials at {{convert|8,400|ihp|kW|lk=on|abbr=on}}. Normal coal capacity was 115 tons.<ref name=Friedman1/> |
||
An interesting note on destroyers is that they have continuously increased in size since their inception. The ''Bainbridge'' was under 650 tons full load; some |
An interesting note on destroyers is that they have continuously increased in size since their inception. The ''Bainbridge'' was under 650 tons full load; some {{sclass-|Arleigh Burke|destroyer|1}}s in service in 2013 displace 10,800 tons full load, more than the [[standard displacement]] limit on 1920s {{sclass-|Pensacola|cruiser|4}} "Treaty cruisers". |
||
==Service== |
==Service== |
||
A few ''Bainbridge''s were deployed to the [[Philippines]] 1904-1917. During the US participation in |
A few ''Bainbridge''s were deployed to the [[Philippines]] 1904-1917. During the US participation in World War I, these were redeployed to the [[Mediterranean]] as convoy escorts. Others of the class served in the [[U-boat Campaign (World War I)|Atlantic]], on the US East Coast, or guarded the [[Panama Canal]]. {{USS|Chauncey|DD-3|2}} collided with the British [[merchant ship]] SS ''Rose'' in 1917 and was lost. Following the [[Armistice of 11 November 1918|Armistice]], the remainder were sold for scrapping or merchant conversion in 1919. |
||
==Ships in class== |
==Ships in class== |
Revision as of 17:21, 4 March 2016
Officially designated as Torpedo Boat Destroyers (TBDs) when authorized by an Act of Congress on 4 May 1898 under the fiscal year 1899 program,[1][2] the Bainbridge-class destroyers were the first destroyers so designated of the United States Navy, built from 1899 through 1903. These were the first 13 of 16 TBDs (3 were Truxtun-class TBDs) authorized by Congress in 1898 following the Spanish–American War, and were decommissioned and sold in 1919 following service in World War I. One ship was lost at sea: Chauncey, which collided with the British merchant ship S.S. Rose in 1917. After decommissioning, the 12 remaining ships were sold to Joseph G. Hitner of Philadelphia, except for Hopkins. Hopkins was sold to the Denton Shore Lumber Company in Tampa, Florida.
Subclasses
Some sources subdivide the Bainbridge class into additional classes.[3][4][5]
- Hopkins and Hull had a turtledeck forward and may be considered to be Hopkins class. These had their two single torpedo tubes replaced by two twin torpedo tubes during World War I; total torpedoes remained at four.[5][1]
- Lawrence and Macdonough had a turtledeck forward, Fore River boilers, carried their funnels in only one group of four, and may be considered to be Lawrence class. In 1906 two additional 6-pounder guns were substituted for the two 3-inch guns to save weight.[1]
- Paul Jones, Perry and Preble carried one twin torpedo tube instead of two singles beginning in World War I and may be considered to be Paul Jones class.[5]
- Stewart was equipped with Seabury boilers and was the fastest of the 400-tonners on trials at 29.7 knots (55.0 km/h; 34.2 mph), but her trial displacement of 444 long tons (451 t) is described as unrealistically light.[1][6]
Design
Origins
Some references, including contemporary ones, describe four ocean-going torpedo boats launched in 1898-1899 as the first US destroyers based on their tonnage, which ranged from 235 tons to 340 tons. These were Farragut, Stringham, Goldsborough, and Bailey. Stringham, the largest of these, was larger than some contemporary British destroyers.[7][6] However, at 420 tons the Bainbridges were considerably larger and had a significantly greater gun armament than the four 6-pounders of the torpedo boats.
The Bainbridge class were produced on the recommendation of an 1898 war plans board formed to prosecute the Spanish–American War and chaired by Assistant Secretary of the Navy Theodore Roosevelt. The poor sea-keeping qualities of existing torpedo boats (such as the 165-ton USS Porter (TB-6)) and the existence of Spanish torpedo boat destroyers (such as the 370-ton Furor) were cited as reasons for the US to build its own destroyers.[6]
Due to construction difficulties the Bainbridges were completed 1901–02, thus too late for the Spanish–American War.[6] However, the destroyer type was instituted in the US Navy, as it had been in the British Royal Navy around 1895 with the A-class destroyers. No further torpedo boats were constructed for the US Navy until the outbreak of World War II in Europe, and by then they had no design relationship to destroyers (see PT boats). It should be noted that the Imperial German Navy of 1898–1918 used the term "torpedo boat" for anything up to a large destroyer in size.
Armament
At 420 tons normal displacement, the Bainbridges were twice as big as most previous torpedo boats. The extra displacement was used for a greatly increased gun armament and a sufficient engineering plant to rival the torpedo boats in speed (28 kn (52 km/h; 32 mph) vs. 29 kn (54 km/h; 33 mph)).[6] The torpedo armament remained at two 18-inch (457 mm) torpedo tubes; although the torpedo boat's mission was being transferred to the destroyer, apparently increased gun armament was more important to the designers than increased torpedo armament.[8]
The gun armament of two 3 in (76 mm)/50 caliber guns and five 6-pounder (2.2 in (57 mm)) guns was a great increase over the four 6-pounder guns of the torpedo boat Farragut.[9][10] It reflected a desire to quickly disable torpedo boats before they could get within range of friendly battleships. Future destroyer classes included progressive increases in armament.
The class was equipped with one or two depth charge racks during World War I for the anti-submarine mission.[11]
Engineering
The best available technologies of coal-fired boilers and triple-expansion engines were used for propulsion, although steam turbines would be adopted in the next generation of US destroyers, beginning with the Template:Sclass- launched in 1908. The need for faster destroyers was to be a significant driver of naval propulsion technology throughout the type's future development.
Bainbridge had four Thornycroft boilers supplying 275 psi (1,900 kPa) steam to two triple-expansion engines totaling 7,000 ihp (5,200 kW) (design).[5] She made 28.45 kn (32.7 mph; 52.7 km/h) on trials at 8,000 ihp (6,000 kW). Normal coal capacity was 213 tons.[6]
Hopkins had four Thornycroft boilers supplying steam to two triple-expansion engines totaling 7,000 ihp (5,200 kW) (design).[5] She made 29.02 kn (33.4 mph; 53.7 km/h) on trials at 8,456 ihp (6,306 kW). Normal coal capacity was 150 tons.[6]
Lawrence had four Normand boilers supplying steam to two triple-expansion engines totaling 8,400 ihp (6,300 kW) (design).[5] She made 28.41 kn (32.7 mph; 52.6 km/h) on trials at 8,400 ihp (6,300 kW). Normal coal capacity was 115 tons.[6]
An interesting note on destroyers is that they have continuously increased in size since their inception. The Bainbridge was under 650 tons full load; some Template:Sclass-s in service in 2013 displace 10,800 tons full load, more than the standard displacement limit on 1920s Template:Sclass- "Treaty cruisers".
Service
A few Bainbridges were deployed to the Philippines 1904-1917. During the US participation in World War I, these were redeployed to the Mediterranean as convoy escorts. Others of the class served in the Atlantic, on the US East Coast, or guarded the Panama Canal. Chauncey collided with the British merchant ship SS Rose in 1917 and was lost. Following the Armistice, the remainder were sold for scrapping or merchant conversion in 1919.
Ships in class
The thirteen ships of the Bainbridge class were:[1][12][13][14]
Ship | Shipyard | Laid down | Launched | Commissioned | Decommissioned | Fate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USS Bainbridge (DD-1) | Neafie and Levy Ship and Engine Building Company, Philadelphia | 15 August 1899 | 27 August 1901 | 12 February 1903 | 15 September 1919 | Sold to Joseph G. Hitner for merchant conversion |
USS Barry (DD-2) | Neafie and Levy Ship and Engine Building Company | 1899 | 22 March 1902 | 24 November 1902 | 28 June 1919 | Sold to Joseph G. Hitner |
USS Chauncey (DD-3) | Neafie and Levy Ship and Engine Building Company | 1899 | 26 October 1901 | 21 February 1903 | 19 November 1917 (sunk) | Sunk in collision with British SS Rose |
USS Dale (DD-4) | William R. Trigg Company, Richmond, Virginia | 1899 | 24 July 1900 | 13 February 1903 | 9 July 1919 | Sold to Joseph G. Hitner |
USS Decatur (DD-5) | William R. Trigg Company, Richmond, Virginia | 1899 | 26 September 1900 | 19 May 1902 | 20 June 1919 | Sold to Joseph G. Hitner |
USS Hopkins (DD-6) | Harlan & Hollingsworth Company, Wilmington, Delaware | 1899 | 24 April 1902 | 23 September 1903 | 20 June 1919 | Sold to Denton Shore Lumber Co., Tampa, FL |
USS Hull (DD-7) | Harlan & Hollingsworth Company | 1899 | 21 June 1902 | 20 May 1903 | 7 July 1919 | Sold to Joseph G. Hitner |
USS Lawrence (DD-8) | Fore River Ship & Engine Company, Quincy, Massachusetts | 10 April 1899 | 7 November 1900 | 7 April 1903 | 20 June 1919 | Sold to Joseph G. Hitner |
USS Macdonough (DD-9) | Fore River Ship & Engine Company | 10 April 1899 | 24 December 1900 | 5 September 1903 | 3 September 1919 | Sold to Joseph G. Hitner for scrapping |
USS Paul Jones (DD-10) | Union Iron Works, San Francisco | 20 April 1899 | 14 June 1902 | 19 July 1902 | 15 September 1919 | Sold to Joseph G. Hitner for scrapping |
USS Perry (DD-11) | Union Iron Works | 19 April 1899 | 27 October 1900 | 4 September 1902 | 2 July 1919 | Sold to Joseph G. Hitner for scrapping |
USS Preble (DD-12) | Union Iron Works | 21 April 1899 | 2 March 1901 | 14 December 1903 | 11 July 1919 | Sold to Joseph G. Hitner |
USS Stewart (DD-13) | Gas Engine and Power Company, Morris Heights, New York | 24 January 1900 | 10 May 1902 | 1 December 1902 | 9 July 1919 | Sold to Joseph G. Hitner for scrapping |
See also
References
- ^ a b c d e Bauer and Roberts, p. 168
- ^ Simpson p. 148, 151
- ^ DestroyerHistory.org First US destroyers
- ^ Tin Can Sailors @ Destroyers.org - Destroyer classes
- ^ a b c d e f Gardiner and Chesneau, pp. 157-158
- ^ a b c d e f g h Friedman, pp. 9-19, 452-453
- ^ Gardiner and Chesneau, pp. 90-94, 157-158
- ^ US Navy Torpedo History, part 2
- ^ DiGiulian, Tony 3"/50 Mk 2 at NavWeaps.com
- ^ DiGiulian, Tony 6 pdr Mk 1 at NavWeaps.com
- ^ Friedman, p. 68
- ^ DestroyerHistory.org Bainbridge class destroyer
- ^ DestroyerHistory.org Hopkins class destroyer
- ^ DestroyerHistory.org Lawrence class destroyer
This article incorporates text from the public domain Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships.
Bibliography
- Bauer, K. Jack; Roberts, Stephen S. (1991). Register of Ships of the U.S. Navy, 1775-1990: Major Combatants. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-26202-0.
- Friedman, Norman (2004). US Destroyers: An Illustrated Design History (Revised Edition). Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-442-3.
- Gardiner, Robert; Chesneau, Roger (1979). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships, 1860–1905. New York: Mayflower Books. ISBN 0-8317-0302-4.
- Simpson, Richard V. Building The Mosquito Fleet, The US Navy's First Torpedo Boats. Charleston, South Carolina:Arcadia Publishing, 2001, ISBN 0-7385-0508-0.
- Silverstone, Paul H. (1970). U.S. Warships of World War I. London: Ian Allan. ISBN 0-71100-095-6.
External links
- Tin Can Sailors @ Destroyers.org - Bainbridge class destroyer
- Tin Can Sailors @ Destroyers.org - Hopkins class destroyer
- Tin Can Sailors @ Destroyers.org - Lawrence class destroyer
- Tin Can Sailors @ Destroyers.org - Destroyer classes
- DestroyerHistory.org Bainbridge class destroyer
- DestroyerHistory.org Hopkins class destroyer
- DestroyerHistory.org Lawrence class destroyer
- DestroyerHistory.org First US destroyers
- NavSource Destroyer Photo Index Page
- DiGiulian, Tony Navweaps.com Pre-WWII US Torpedoes
- DiGiulian, Tony Navweaps.com 3"/50 Mks 2, 3, 5, 6, and 8
- DiGiulian, Tony Navweaps.com USN 6 pdr Mks 1 through 13
- US Navy Torpedo History, part 2