Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Pro-choice]]. It is considered [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. If you want to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Test2a-n (Second level warning) --> [[User:Catamorphism|Catamorphism]] 16:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Pro-choice]]. It is considered [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. If you want to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Test2a-n (Second level warning) --> [[User:Catamorphism|Catamorphism]] 16:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Pro-choice]], you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:Test3a-n (Third level blanking/removing warning) --> [[User:Catamorphism|Catamorphism]] 17:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Revision as of 17:42, 2 June 2006
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- 16:20, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
This message is regarding your edit summary for edits to the article Kwanzaa. Please see WP:NPA and avoid using summaries such as "rv - killerdog is not reading before making edits or else he is lying". KillerChihuahua?!?17:01, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I read the link and it was a message posted on Free Republic talk page by a private user. It should not be likened to Free Republic and it was not endorsed by FRre Republic (merely because it didn't choose to delete the users message) anymore than whatever we say here is endorsed by Wikipedia. Just thought you should know, because it looks like you didn't read the page very closely.Gator(talk)18:45, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh and it didn;t say anything about vandalism or "far right wing POV vandalism" that was your assumption and you revealed your own biases. It was calling for conservtives to edit more on those artciles. I don't like the approach myself but to term it "far-right POV vandalism" is unfair and needs to be stated.Gator(talk)18:48, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
136.215.251.179 seems to be the user Goodandevil's IP [2]. User Herostratus asked Goodandevil if he is Notwithstanding from the Free Republic forum on his talk page. [3] This is something I have also wondered, as the Free Republic member Notwithstanding, who initiated the editor recruitment on that forum, makes a characteristic mention of abortion and Kwanzaa, articles on which the Wikipedian Goodandevil has a history. Just a thought. -Kyd21:42, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. Voice-of-AllT|@|ESP17:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]