This is a page on the teachings of Falun Dafa. Opinions, theoretical studies, Epistemological and Ontological analysis must go into the corressponding page.

WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A FALUN GONG DISCUSSION FORUM! Please, add new messages pertaining to editing the FLG article in the appropriate place

Samuel, you know that we are talking about creating a stand alone article on the Controversies. Introducing as much as you have here without any discussion is inappropriate. CovenantD 02:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the first paragraph says nothing about the teachings, a waste of my time. --Yueyuen 01:40, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The block quote the practice section was introduced as it summarizes the purpose of the exercises and the role practice(the exercises) plays in the cultivation system of Falun Gong. Thats central to Falun Gong teaching. Dilip rajeev 04:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why was this article moved from Falun Gong teachings to this new title? I can't find any discussion of this move or whether there was a consensus regarding the move. Ande B 01:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion about splitting the main Falun Gong article has been going on for quite a while (it was over 100k). This is actually one of the less contentious moves. CovenantD 02:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I saw that the main article was rather long, though quite interesting. I wasn't looking for an argument, just curious. I get rather confused at times about naming conventions & article moves. I look for consistencies and just don't seem to find them when I expect them! Ande B 02:30, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't see any relation between splitting the main article and renaming the daughter article. What is difference betwen "Teachings of Falun Gong" and "Falun Gong teachings"? How about we rename other articles also if there is a convention? Or people can just do it without reason? Quite puzzled. Fnhddzs 05:44, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Me neither. You'd think someone could point to a WP policy on this. Ande B 05:56, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Fnhddzs 05:52, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]