m →thanks |
learned abour starting a new section instead of commenting within an existing section. |
||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
Because of your work with the [[Chicago]] article I'd like you to take a look at it if you have the time & desire. It is currently up for Peer Review (see [[Talk:Chicago|Chicago Talk]]) and I would enjoy hearing your feedback to help us all guide the growth of this article. |
Because of your work with the [[Chicago]] article I'd like you to take a look at it if you have the time & desire. It is currently up for Peer Review (see [[Talk:Chicago|Chicago Talk]]) and I would enjoy hearing your feedback to help us all guide the growth of this article. |
||
[[User:Jasenlee|Jasenlee]] 01:18, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC) |
[[User:Jasenlee|Jasenlee]] 01:18, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC) |
||
==On Starting a New Section== |
|||
I agree completely. Once you pointed out my ''[[faux pas]]'' I realized what did wrong with my inquiry. Also, thanks for the ''heads up'' about [[User:SPUI|SPUI]], I didn't know what to think about him. [[User:Hydnjo|hydnjo]] [[User talk:Hydnjo|talk]] 03:13, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:13, 14 April 2005
Hi, and welcome. Please when starting a new topic.
I may add section headers and attribution for comments, and I may adjust margins and alignment for clarity.
Archives:
- Archive 1 (11/22/2004–3/2/2005)
- Archive 2 (3/2/2005–3/30/2005) ← I seem to have increased my participation on Wikipedia
Anon copyvios
Yep, I've seen your handywork. I had time to tag one of them before noticing you did all the others. Nice job! Mgm|(talk) 09:18, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
admin
Congrats on becoming an admin. I saw that you were accepted. My goal is to become an admin in the future. Do you have any suggestions about what I should do?Rentastrawberry 02:30, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
Block conflicts
Hi KS, thanks for letting me know about the block conflict thing. I took a look but have no idea how to install it. (Note that I'm having to call it a thing, because I don't even know what it is). Can you help me to do it? I use a Mac OS 10.3.8 and the latest Netscape in case that matters. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:43, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
question
Are you saying that I have to put a closing tag for the vfd? I don't really get what you're saying. Or are you saying that I have to add that page to the vfd list? I thought it just added automatically? --Rentastrawberry 00:07, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
I looked at the page and I believe I understand it. I'll remember to use the other tag. If you see that I did something wrong just let me know on my talk page, and please change it so I wouldn't have as much wikiembarassment.
how the hell did you learn all this Rentastrawberry 01:04, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
one more thing....how do you get the "you have new messages" thing to go away. Rentastrawberry 01:07, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
Gallery markup
Thanks for the note. I like getting the aforemented message notice too much. Anyway, I noted of the change in markup when I was working cleaning up Audrey Munson the other night, and I was pleasantly surprised. ~~Shiri — Talk~~ 04:46, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
Once Upon a Time
I just wanted to let you know that in the Department of Fun there is a new thing that I'm gonna start tomorrow at 6 pm pacific time. You might be interested in it. Its the Once Upon a Time page. Check it out.--Rentastrawberry 06:22, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
Grammer
What? I was fixing the grammer of the caption on the image? Did I miss something? -- 208.187.198.47 08:17, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
help
I tried the new vfd thing, and I can't get it. This is what I do. I go to the page, put the {{subst:vfd}} tag on the page. Then I go to the entry thing for why i wanted it deleted, and I tell why and put a heading. Then I save the page. Now I go to the Wikipedia: Votes for deletion page and put {{Wikipedia:Votes for Deletion/Page Name}} . It always messes up. What am I doing? --Rentastrawberry 22:26, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
I got it! I can't believe that all you did was put D instead of d. Thats crazy--Rentastrawberry 01:55, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
Go to Hell
Please do NOT leave threats of banning on the pages of others. Loser. [I Hate Georgia Guy (talk · contribs)]
Vandalism To My Userpage
Thanks for fixing that, turns out a 'friend' of mine from school thought it would be funny to do that. Keep up the good work. MicahMN | Talk 01:01, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[Dr Zen]
Yes, I am. [203.103.60.119 (talk · contribs)]
Vandalism from that IP
Actually, the vandalism was to Anthony's user talk page. As it was personal attack vandalism, it was clear that the IP knew what he was doing, and so I blocked. Snowspinner 12:12, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
Reversion
Just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit ([1]) which I assume was made in error. Thanks! — Knowledge Seeker দ 19:13, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- This must be what they call a revert conflict then. I reverted to a version without the "gay nigger"-bit, at least that was what it looked like on my end of the line. Weird. Shinobu 20:11, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Ok, I put my coin image on the parodies page then.
Hello
OK, I put my coin image on the parodies page as an example of a contemporary parody.
Maximus. [Maximus7 (talk · contribs)]
Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism of my user page. You did it so fast, I didn't even notice it happened until I checked the history just now. Mgm|(talk) 11:12, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Udaipur: Lake Palace Photo
Hullo Knowledgeseeker, I noticed your question about the copyright of this photo. I took this photo in Feb 2004. Feel free to use it. And if I need to correct the copyright information somewhere, please let me know how. Lakhindr 16:45, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Bhili Language
Hey Knowledge Seeker (sorry, I don't know your name...) could you take a minute and check out the stub at Bhili language as well as the discussion on its talk page and the VfD page? Could you also check briefly to see whether there is a Hindi or Gujarati article that can be interwikied? Do you know anyone involved with either of those wikipediæ who might be willing to take the time to contribute more to the Bhili language article? I found the article भीली, in the Hindi Wikipedia, but I'm not sure how relevant that miniscule article is (I don't actually know any hindian languages...) Thanks for your time, Tomer TALK 21:51, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Hey! hi:Tomer does so work! ;-) Cool. An article about me, in Hindi, and I'm so special they named it with the Roman alphabet. (Obviously, I'm joking...) Thanks for taking the time to look it over, as well as for your efforts to get others to maybe look into further developing it. Tomer TALK 08:14, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
Abuse of power
Can you please unblock my account? I was in the midst of performing contributory edits and was not trying to be disruptive, as User:Snowspinner put it. Yes I do openly support GRider's efforts to better school articles on Wikipedia but I hardly see how that is a reason to ban someone. School Inclusionist 02:29, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC) [208.62.7.133 (talk · contribs)]
- Hi, School Inclusionist, thanks for contacting me. Unfortunately, I'm not comfortable in removing your block, as I am still a new administrator and this issue is not very clear-cut for me. I was about to ask for some outside opinions on WP:AN/I, but I see they are already discussing it there. I, personally, would not have blocked you, but I deal with more straightforward issues like vandalism. Also, it is a bit unusual for a new user to register with a name representing a side in a controversial debate and jump right in to editing on that topic. The timing of your arrival, right after User:GRider was blocked, probably raised a few eyebrows as well. I'm not accusing anything, but just pointing out why people might be wondering. — Knowledge Seeker দ 08:24, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Note to any third-party readers: User:School Inclusionist is discussing a perceived abuse of power by another administrator, not by me. — Knowledge Seeker দ 08:30, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thanks

Hi. I just wanted to thank you for answering my question about user contributions. I used it as you can see on my user page. Howabout1 03:46, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Chicago
Because of your work with the Chicago article I'd like you to take a look at it if you have the time & desire. It is currently up for Peer Review (see Chicago Talk) and I would enjoy hearing your feedback to help us all guide the growth of this article. Jasenlee 01:18, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
On Starting a New Section
I agree completely. Once you pointed out my faux pas I realized what did wrong with my inquiry. Also, thanks for the heads up about SPUI, I didn't know what to think about him. hydnjo talk 03:13, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)