User:SarekOfVulcan

   run at Mon Jun 23 21:36:17 2008 GMT

   Category talk:         3
   Category:              13
   Image talk:            3
   Image:                 152
   Mainspace              5226
   MediaWiki talk:        2
   Portal talk:           2
   Portal:                1
   Talk:                  964
   Template talk:         8
   Template:              26
   User talk:             1858
   User:                  149
   Wikipedia talk:        103
   Wikipedia:             1174
   avg edits per page     2.28
   earliest               06:40, 30 March 2004
   number of unique pages 4252
   total                  9684

   2004/3  3
   2004/4  0
   2004/5  0
   2004/6  0
   2004/7  52
   2004/8  31
   2004/9  20
   2004/10 8
   2004/11 2
   2004/12 11
   2005/1  8
   2005/2  10
   2005/3  11
   2005/4  10
   2005/5  22
   2005/6  38
   2005/7  55
   2005/8  20
   2005/9  28
   2005/10 268
   2005/11 467
   2005/12 945
   2006/1  688
   2006/2  239
   2006/3  11
   2006/4  0
   2006/5  9
   2006/6  61
   2006/7  296
   2006/8  39
   2006/9  31
   2006/10 127
   2006/11 91
   2006/12 26
   2007/1  13
   2007/2  20
   2007/3  22
   2007/4  16
   2007/5  234
   2007/6  574
   2007/7  633
   2007/8  903
   2007/9  854
   2007/10 835
   2007/11 433
   2007/12 601
   2008/1  404
   2008/2  100
   2008/3  20
   2008/4  90
   2008/5  82
   2008/6  223

   (green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red
   denotes edits without an edit summary)

                       Mainspace
   139 [2]Freemasonry
   74  [3]List of Freemasons
   62  [4]Herbert W. Armstrong
   59  [5]Visual FoxPro
   50  [6]International Order of the Rainbow for Girls
   50  [7]Bangor, Maine
   38  [8]Classical High School
   37  [9]Order of the Eastern Star
   34  [10]Condom
   32  [11]Glenn Greenwald
   32  [12]Anti-Masonry
   32  [13]Rhode Island
   30  [14]DeMolay International
   30  [15]Mike Tyson
   29  [16]Diane Duane

                  Talk:
   120 [17]Herbert W. Armstrong
   116 [18]Freemasonry
   37  [19]List of Freemasons
   37  [20]Catholicism and Freemasonry
   28  [21]Condom
   20  [22]Anti-Masonry
   19  [23]Knights of Columbus
   13  [24]Knights of Columbus/Archive 1
   13  [25]Seattle, Washington
   11  [26]Order of the Eastern Star
   10  [27]Rosa Parks
   10  [28]Visual FoxPro
   10  [29]Taxil hoax
   10  [30]Roman Catholic Church
   8   [31]Ted Stevens

           Category talk:
   2 [32]Roman Catholic Wikipedians

              Category:
   3 [33]Catholic Wikipedians
   2 [34]Roman Catholic Wikipedians
   2 [35]Wikipedian clarinetists-4

                Image:
   7 [36]AtwaterDulcimer.jpg
   5 [37]VisualFoxProScreenshot.png
   5 [38]DeepW.jpg
   4 [39]Inara Serra1.jpg
   3 [40]Cover 091907.gif
   3 [41]Orono Maine seal.jpg
   3 [42]Book of Night with Moon.gif
   3 [43]HighW.jpg
   3 [44]PikePlaceMarketCrowd.jpg
   3 [45]FireflySimonTam1.jpg
   3 [46]JayneCobb.jpg
   3 [47]Ff kaylee.jpg
   3 [48]MalReynoldsFirefly.JPG
   3 [49]S618 Spike.png
   3 [50]Oes GGC color.PNG

     MediaWiki talk:
   2 [51]Bad image list

    Portal talk:
   2 [52]Ice hockey

          Template:
   9 [53]Young Wizards
   2 [54]Clarinet
   2 [55]Template sandbox
   2 [56]Magazine rationale

        Template talk:
   3 [57]Non-free promotional

                 User:
   85 [58]SarekOfVulcan
   17 [59]SarekOfVulcan/monobook.js
   7  [60]SarekOfVulcan/Admin coaching
   7  [61]KJVTRUTH
   5  [62]Lightbringer
   2  [63]Vitamin a

           User talk:
   176 [64]SarekOfVulcan
   24  [65]Chooserr
   14  [66]Lisasmall
   10  [67]StevenBlack
   9   [68]Jebbrady
   8   [69]Punk-Lova
   8   [70]Skull 'n' Femurs
   7   [71]DonaNobisPacem
   7   [72]Shell Kinney
   7   [73]RelHistBuff
   7   [74]Airevgeny
   7   [75]Fang Aili/Archive20
   7   [76]AcadiaMagic
   7   [77]Adrian.walker
   6   [78]Angel David

                             Wikipedia:
   49 [79]Requests for page protection
   43 [80]Administrator intervention against vandalism
   38 [81]Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
   36 [82]Administrators' noticeboard
   22 [83]Requests for comment/Jebbrady
   19 [84]Requests for arbitration/Lightbringer/Workshop
   17 [85]Village pump (assistance)
   17 [86]Articles for deletion/Democracy & Nature
   16 [87]Wikiquette alerts
   15 [88]Articles for deletion/Elf Sternberg (2nd nomination)
   14 [89]Articles for deletion/Brianna Rieffel (second nomination)
   14 [90]Articles for deletion/Lake Ontario Waterkeeper
   13 [91]Village pump (policy)
   12 [92]Articles for deletion/Clanton, Mississippi
   11 [93]Articles for deletion/Log/2007 September 25

               Wikipedia talk:
   13 [94]AutoWikiBrowser
   7  [95]WikiProject Freemasonry
   6  [96]Requests for comment
   4  [97]Twinkle
   4  [98]WikiProject Star Trek
   3  [99]Non-free content criteria/Proposal
   3  [100]WikiProject Judaism
   3  [101]AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage
   3  [102]Requests for comment/Jebbrady
   3  [103]Notability (music)
   2  [104]Citing sources
   2  [105]WikiProject Science Fiction
   2  [106]WikiProject Rhode Island
   2  [107]Notability (people)
   2  [108]Article Rescue Squadron

   If there were any problems, please [109]email Interiot or post at
   [110]User talk:Interiot.

• The edit count was retrieved from this link at 21:36, 23 June 2008 (UTC).

Moved from oppose section:

1. Kurt, can you provide a real reason to oppose? Self nominations are explicitly allowed. Bringing your disgruntlement with the RFA process into individual cases is WP:POINT in my opinion. Jehochman ^Talk 01:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   Don't use that blue link. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 01:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   Bureaucrats approve adminship by not only the votes, but more of general consensus. By the way, I found it humorous when people contradict themselves =) Aquarius • talk 04:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   Aquarius, do not insult Kurt with that line. It's been two years since that RfA, and you are not assuming good faith with that comment in any way whatsoever. —Dark ^talk 07:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   Kurt Weber has been assuming bad faith on the part of self-noms for years now, while Aquarius makes one comment and gets jumped on. As a former bureaucrat I would completely ignore any vote with this type of reason (and, as well, any oppose vote with no reason given) so it's not a big deal anyway. ugen64 (talk) 17:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   Kurts views are common knowledge at RfA, something i am suprised you weren't aware of before nominating yourself. But neway, there are many who disagree with kurt, i am one of them. What everyone does should and mostly do agree on is that he has a view, and a reason to oppose and is entitled to give it here. Seddσn ^{talk Editor Review} 18:11, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   I know that Kurt's account is not a SPA; however I disagree with this, this and this, as there is no change on the reason. The last time I told Kurt to stop this, Wisdom89 insulted me, telling me to be careful when using the troll term. Let's have an example of a RfA troll account: Amorde2 always opposes to RfAs in the Spanish Wikipedia (see example here; there are plenty more). Kurt is very similar, with the difference that he only opposes only to self-nom RfAs. My suggestion would be to tell Kurt to stop this or being on the risk of getting blocked. macy^talk 19:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   Not quite true, he opposes admin-coached RFAs as well. In any case, it's clear he's entrenched in his opinion and he rarely responds to discussion regarding it. Someone should shuffle this discussion off to the talk page. –xenocidic (talk) 19:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   This is a subject we shouldn't be quarrelling over any more. It's a very dated subject matter. There was one of a number of large-scale and high profile debates about this months ago, in which I was involved, and no-one should be made to go through it again. Nothing will change as a result of this, so "be what may". Lradrama 20:16, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   Totally agree. Tan | 39 20:34, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]