This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 00:24, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

spamlink —Wahoofive (talk) 06:34, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep (changed from Delete) on Wikibofh's argument. But the Badvertisment has to be written out. Alf 00:04, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Marketing. --GraemeL ^(talk) 12:18, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Wikibofh. --GraemeL ^(talk) 09:12, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep. I've actually heard discussions of ArtistShare several times on NPR. Here is a link to one story. It included interviews from notable musicians who used this to finance albums and composition. This includes Grammy winner Maria Schneider (musician) who won the Grammy for an album produced via ArtistShare. From the website: It is the first recording in history to win a Grammy that is only distributed on the Internet! Article does need to be expanded though. Wikibofh 23:36, August 25, 2005 (UTC)

• Comment:Cleaned the article up some. Wikibofh 00:24, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep seems to be notable form of music distribution via the Internet used by a Grammy Award winner and Trey Anastasio of Phish fame. Capitalistroadster 23:51, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.