The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:HenriqueQatar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image is listed on this page from the Qatar FA with the note "All rights reserved" at the base of the page Peripitus (Talk) 00:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Ronhjones (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hand.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The source information was added by Sfan00 IMG (talk · contribs) in Special:Diff/562368586. Unfortunately, it doesn't say where he got the information from, so we don't know whether the information is correct or not. Stefan2 (talk) 00:28, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:SamiMubarakDhofarOPLcup.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is a crop of this image from this club page there the image is credited to Mohammed Al-Shibli (محمد الشبلي) Peripitus (Talk) 00:34, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heed.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• If this was "provided by the West Vancouver Police Department", then I fail to see how the uploader can be the copyright holder. Stefan2 (talk) 14:56, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kash Heed.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See section immediately above. Same image but different file format, so ineligible for WP:CSD#F1. Stefan2 (talk) 14:57, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It is claimed that the uploader is the copyright holder, but it seems more likely that this was created on behalf of a country's army. When I make a Google search for this image, I find a lot of Nazi propaganda, so maybe the picture comes from Nazi Germany. Stefan2 (talk) 15:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:HeidiSQL main screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It says:

If the uploader isn't the copyright holder, then the file should not indicate that the uploader is the copyright holder. Also, evidence is needed that the file is licensed under the indicated CC licence. Stefan2 (talk) 15:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

Reinoutr is wrong. HeidiSQL is free and open-source, under GPL license. The license on Commons is correct.

In addition, Ansgar Becker is the author of HeidiSQL; so if the uploader is indeed this person, the image is officially CC. This something that is easily resolved with an OTRS ticket.

Best regards,

Codename Lisa (talk) 01:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so if this isn't resolved with OTRS, we should still keep the image but simply change the copyright tag to {{GPL}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Or take the shortcut: If we deleted this file and let the version on Commons that bears the same name take over, it would be nice. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 22:53, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rhinos Hoarding.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Querying this as it appears to be a picture of an advertising hoarding. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:24, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-free advertisement. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Merrill upload 800.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a headstone, with sculptural elements? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No freedom of panorama for gravestones in the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henry Newbolt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Drawing by Sir William Rothenstein. Seems to be from 1920, but is sourced to a 1939 book, which could easily be the first publication. In the United States, pictures by British artists are typically protected by copyright for 95 years from publication, and 1939 was less than 95 years ago. Stefan2 (talk) 16:55, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- unless a valid rationale can be found.Qxukhgiels (talk) 22:22, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep as file is PD-US. TLSuda (talk) 14:32, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:St Bartholmews East Perth.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source says that image is from sometime in the 1940s - although probably PD in Australia, there's no evidence that it was published prior to 1946, which would be required to make this image PD in the United States. Kelly ^hi! 17:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's not correct. It is sufficient for PD-US if the first publication was before 1 March 1989, but the photograph must have been taken before 1946. The publication must additionally be without compliance of United States copyright formalities. Of course, in this case, there is no evidence of any publication at all. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ah, thanks for the clarification. I still struggle with a lot of the URAA provisions. Kelly ^hi! 18:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• The photographer was one "George Backshall", whose collection of photographs were donated to the Battye Library as the "Backshall Collection"[1]. A search of death notices in Perth around that era found 2: George Augustus Backshall died 18 March, 1940 [2] and George Fredrick Backshall died 5 April, 1950 [3]. I can't say which it is. Moondyne (talk) 13:03, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reidlibraryuwa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Watermarked image, web resolution - no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 18:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hilton.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Overwritten file: two in one.

1. File uploaded by Ammar shaker (talk · contribs): I don't know whether this constitutes a source. If not, the file should be deleted due to lack of source.
2. File uploaded by Neorge (talk · contribs): No licence provided. Stefan2 (talk) 20:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: These were all deleted back in March. Diannaa (talk) 03:20, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Ladywood Room.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Lounge bar of the Moor Hall Hotel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:View of exterior (lounge bar 2).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:History 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Moor Hall Staff.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

These seem to be historic photos, so the claim that they were created by the uploader looks dubious. Impossible to tell whether they are in the public domain because of age. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:04, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Home book.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Book cover, so the uploader is probably not able to tri-license it under {{PD-self}}, {{GFDL-with-disclaimers}} and {{cc-by-sa-3.0-migrated-with-disclaimers}}. Additionally, it says that the file only may be used on Wikipedia. Stefan2 (talk) 21:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: reverted to the sourced image - Peripitus (Talk) 20:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hostel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Overwritten file: two in one.

1. File uploaded by Anshu.tomar (talk · contribs): Properly sourced and licensed. Keep this one.
2. File uploaded by Nmehra6613 (talk · contribs): Sourced but not licensed. Delete this one. Stefan2 (talk) 22:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the proposed revision. Please! It is almost two month now. Codename Lisa (talk) 13:55, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Condoms 08293403.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Author claims they have taken the photo, but this is questionable:

1. The file contains "Copyright (c) 1998 Hewlett-Packard Company" - yet the description say it was taken in 2006
2. The same image is being sold at http://www.fotosearch.com/FSA158/x12312040/ for a much higher resolution, note the lower orange condom is blanked out in the upload.
3. Again, another higher resolution one is available at http://www.f1online.de/de/bild-details/1561645.html
4. A quick google shows many higher resolutions available, why was such a low-res uploaded?
5. Why is one of the condoms blanked out? And badly.
6. User has also uploaded File:Condom sign.jpg and File:Condom cartoon.jpg which were speedily deleted for blatant copyright infringement.

File should be deleted as it is quite clear the uploaded is not the owner of the image.--Otterathome (talk) 22:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC) Otterathome (talk) 22:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clear derivative work of the fotosearch link above. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: those are not the same images. Qxukhgiels (talk) 20:43, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update Actually, it appears that someone has used my image and photoshopped it and are selling it as their own. Non photoshopped versions: [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] Could someone help me here?Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:49, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These pages unknowingly copied the image upload, unknowingly not realising it was a copyright violation, thereby proliferating the stolen image.--Otterathome (talk) 11:29, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:12, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:No-bs-sign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Description says it is a scan of a sign owned by uploader. Yet it doesn't look like a scan, more like a clipart. User has history of images being deleted for violations. Delete as origin is unknown. Otterathome (talk) 22:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• The fact that the uploader owns a copy of a sign doesn't mean that the uploader is the copyright holder to the sign. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Blatantly not a scan, as claimed by uploader - not that that would matter, because scanning it wouldn't give you copyright to it. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:26, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm going to try to find a source. Would you all just give me time??Qxukhgiels (talk) 20:51, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• The sign is for sale in many different formats of eBay (and probably elsewhere, I haven't checked yet). I've listed this as the source.Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:04, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No point in waiting since the uploader has retired from Wikipedia and his account has been blocked at his request. The supposed source does not release the copyright of this image, and I don't think I would trust an Ebay release even if they had. So, an invalid claim of "Own work". followed by a more than a bit dubious claim that it has been freely released. Meters (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:DBS satellite system works.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• #File contains data saying it was modified and created on 2013-11-18, yet was uploaded in July 2014, why the delay?

1. The satellite dish at the bottom right is watermarked with 123RF, copied from http://www.123rf.com/photo_9840940_satellite-dish.html with no evidence of permission.

Delete as copyright violation.--Otterathome (talk) Otterathome (talk) 22:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed - clear violation. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:29, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Opposition- the icons were purchased from 123RF.com- I've updated that now.Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:36, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  No, they weren't, because if they were, it wouldn't still have the 123RF watermark on it. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:13, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kidde-battery-operated-smoke-alarm-01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like its been copied off a retail website. Higher res available at various other websites. For example http://www.cableorganizer.com/kidde-alarms/micro-ionization-smoke-alarm.html[11][12][13] etc Otterathome (talk) 22:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment by uploader- the alarm was purchased from Amazon.co.uk. I copied the image on the box. I'll update the licensing now.Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jetboil burner bottom.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Jetboil-Joule.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Jetboil helios.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Fluxring.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Also nominating File:Jetboil-Joule.jpg, File:Jetboil helios.jpg and File:Fluxring.jpg for the exact same reason.

• All of these are images are owned by the camping retailer backpacker.com as shown in each description. Unknown author.

Fails WP:NFCCP#1: Products are not limited or historical, or no longer manufactured. Any owner of these products can take the same images. Fails WP:NFCCP#6 & 8: Images of lots of products are not needed to describe the company Jetboil. Article contains excessive images, and advert-like material. So delete per WP:FUC. Otterathome (talk) 22:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:1982 Worlds Fair pocket watch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• EXIF: "All rights reserved, rtphokie@gmail.com for image request" Eeekster (talk) 22:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.