Is there any way to export every wikipedia article (like a wiki dump) as opposed to xml, which I don't like as much. MiniMikeRM (talk) 00:45, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking about export all articles available on Wikipedia or a particular one ? Anatole-berthe (talk) 23:08, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All, I know that you can export one at a time but that would obviously take a while MiniMikeRM (talk) 01:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let's try our best to avoid the XY problem here. Instead, what I'm going to ask you to do is describe what goal you want to accomplish. "I want to take Wikipedia articles, and do Y". Maybe PDF will turn out to not be a good idea for going about what you want to accomplish. --Slowking Man (talk) 05:41, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I am seeking for your assistance to improve Marinduque State University page due to it has already became a university from its college name. But as per review, only few information were added. Hoping for your assistance and contribution from the expert editor and reviewer out there. Thank you. Filipinotayo (talk) 05:47, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Filipinotayo I'm immediately noticing two issues. Firstly, the article is inconsistent with calling it a university or college. Secondly, the entire "Campus" section is unsourced. Those are the most glaring issues. Ultraodan (talk) 05:59, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image here has arrow mark but has red arrow on it.

When I double click on it, arrow mark is gone. Why is that ? HarryOrange (talk) 13:41, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HarryOrange: The arrow is added on to the Wikipedia article, after the main image has been resized and displayed, using the {{superimpose}} template.

Clicking the main image shows it inits original form on WikiCommons. Bazza 7 (talk) 13:49, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I need to archive just one more citation in my article, but the source website (newspapers.com) has blocked me from completing the archive via the Wayback Machine. Numerous attempts to rectify the apparently simple problem with the source site have failed. I otherwise have full access to newspapers.com, so there's no serious issue involved. Could someone please archive https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-pennsylvania-herald-and-york-genera/158594062/ on the Wayback Machine and then post here the resulting archive URL so that I can add it to the article? I really appreciate your help! Tfhentz (talk) 16:02, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking at the Xbox (console) page's modding section and some of the methods mentioned and used are very out to date compared to what is used today.

I would like to put a "needs maintenance" or an "needs updating" banner on this section.

Anyone know how? It's been a while since I've done this.

Thanks,

Urbanracer34 (talk) 16:28, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Urbanracer34: see {{Update}} and {{Update section}}. It is helpful if you can explain the problem on the talk page and put a link to it to the template. TSventon (talk) 16:43, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've proposed the idea on Wikipedia talk:Vital articles#Create a timeline on a subpage that we add a subpage of a meline of level 3 vital people to Wikipedia:Vital articles, and the idea has reached acceptance. Now I'm wondering what the best way to add it as a subpage under it is, and if I should do anything in addition.

Thank you in advance for your help.

Wikieditor662 (talk) 18:03, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adam tactical group.svg to Adam Tactical Group I can't because of protection. Zacharpolis (talk) 03:59, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But what you can do, Zacharpolis, is explain on Talk:Adam Tactical Group why this should be added and more particularly how it is that this logo is your "own work". This should persuade somebody there who (unlike most people at the "teahouse") understands the issues involved. -- Hoary (talk) 08:10, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-UA-exempt}} https://www.facebook.com/Adamtactic/ Zacharpolis (talk) 11:56, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, Zacharpolis, you're not the copyright holder. Then start by correcting the mistakes on c:File:Adam tactical group.svg. Once you've done that, make your request on Talk:Adam Tactical Group. -- Hoary (talk) 12:04, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you wear suit? Zacharpolis (talk) 13:14, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hoary, don't ping me again. If you don't help. Zacharpolis (talk) 13:15, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Hello all,

There is an article that was deleted and turned into a redirect, American Communist Party. It was decided to be deleted, with some information moved to the pages for History of the Communist Party USA and Jackson Hinkle. I am interested in salvaging the article and improving it to add it to the mainspace. Is there any way to find the article in any history or junk areas? Help would be appreciated. -Emily (PhoenixCaelestis) (talk) 16:07, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the AfD discussion, by the way. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Communist Party -Emily (PhoenixCaelestis) (talk) 16:15, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@PhoenixCaelestis: The content has been deleted so only an admin will be able to retrieve it. I suggest asking Ad Orientem, who closed the deletion discussion, on their talk page and presenting any evidence that we should have an article there. TSventon (talk) 16:38, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PhoenixCaelestis. The community concluded by an overwhelming consensus that the subject did not meet our standards for encyclopedic notability. This of course can change. But I would need at least some evidence that either the situation has changed or that there was evidence of notability that was missed in the discussion. If you can provide some concrete evidence of notability, I would consider restoring the article and moving it into draft space. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nearly every other American political party has its own page, even ones that only exist in one state or ones that only lasted a handful of years in the 1800s. The ACP has an entry in Wikidata, and has been covered by several small media outlets. One member even won a seat in Orange County, Vermont. Yes, it hasn't been covered by, say, the New York Times or the Washington Post, but it's because there's simply no reason for large national news outlets to report on a frankly eccentric splinter group of a party that's over 100 years old. If you go digging, the information is there. Plus, when the article was initially made, it was pretty much day one of the party's creation and next to no information about it had been released. With lots of time having now passed, I feel it's enough to warrant an article for this political party. -Emily (PhoenixCaelestis) (talk) 20:36, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @PhoenixCaelestis. I suggest you find three sources that clearly meet WP:42, and present them to @Ad Orientem. ColinFine (talk) 21:31, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PhoenixCaelestis, most people reading this (including Ad Orientem and myself) have other priorities and interests. We're not going to go digging. How about you go digging, and here, in this thread, link to three reliable sources (all of them independent of the ACP) that deal with the ACP in some depth? -- Hoary (talk) 21:31, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and found five sources that I feel cover the party and meet WP:42.

https://www.thefp.com/p/american-communist-party-maga

https://independentpoliticalreport.com/2024/07/american-communist-party-launches-as-reconstitution-of-communist-party-usa-several-clubs-deny-inclusion-in-party-declaration/

https://unitedworldint.com/36094-executive-chairman-of-the-american-communist-party-we-are-preparing-for-a-systemic-and-constitutional-crisis/

https://www.repubblica.it/venerdi/2024/11/08/news/elezioni_usa_trump_comunista_vermont_viaggi_da_fermo-423605605/

https://us.politsturm.com/the-essence-of-the-acp

I was also unaware of this until now, but there is an entry for the party on the German Wikipedia. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Communist_Party

Thanks, all. -Emily (PhoenixCaelestis) (talk) 21:47, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@PhoenixCaelestis Ok. I am satisfied that there is enough coverage to justify restoring the article and moving it into draft space. I will send you a link once I've finished. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:12, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! -Emily (PhoenixCaelestis) (talk) 22:17, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@PhoenixCaelestis The page has been undeleted and moved to Draft:Communist Party USA. This is not an endorsement of the page or the claims to notability. But I think there is enough to justify recreation so it can be worked on in draft space. I suggest submitting it for review once you think it is ready. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:22, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Minor goof, it appears you draftified the full CPUSA article rather than the old ACP article. Just wanted to let you know in case you didn't realize. -Emily (PhoenixCaelestis) (talk) 22:28, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've cleaned up that goof. The restored draft is now at Draft:American Communist Party (2) (Draft:American Communist Party already existed). This feels like a total waste of admin time and effort given that. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:34, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @PhoenixCaelestis. de:American Communist Party has three non-independent sources, and one unreliable one that doesn't even mention the subject. It is therefore of little use in creating an English article. ColinFine (talk) 22:31, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PhoenixCaelestis, please see Draft:American Communist Party. -- Hoary (talk) 22:34, 3 March 2025 (UTC) Edit clash with Pppery (and possible misunderstanding); striking out. -- Hoary (talk) 22:38, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Draft:American Communist Party (2). Draft:American Communist Party was a preexisting draft from 2024. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:36, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If the ACP is described as being part of "the larger MAGA Communism movement", readers may appreciate an article on MAGA Communism that describes the latter as larger than a single "American political commentator and influencer". -- Hoary (talk) 22:50, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Odd views on the two wars (supports RU, opposes Israel). Aside from that, this discussion is finished. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 12:42, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I just started this list List of Hungarian explorers. You can see the text alignment is "center". Do you have any idea how can I make the alignment as default to "left" but only in the description table? OrionNimrod (talk) 21:55, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@OrionNimrod: I used {{Table alignment}}.[1] PrimeHunter (talk) 22:55, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PrimeHunter Thank you very much! OrionNimrod (talk) 22:59, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just pblocked User:JohnAdams1800 for two weeks. However, when I used Twinkle to do it, the block notice came out as gobbledy gook (the block itself worked). I reverted myself and tried again, this time using Twinkle to add only the block notice. Same result. I reverted myself again and handwrote the notice of the block. I suspect it's not Twinkle but something wrong on the Talk page, but I'm not good at finding such things, assuming I'm right. Can someone figure out what happened? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:25, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There was an unclosed <nowiki> tag on the page further above. I've fixed it now. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:00, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Pppery, should I test it, or is that not necessary?--Bbb23 (talk) 02:06, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to, but I'm fairly confident that was all. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:08, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Pppery, couldn't resist. :-) Works perfectly now.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the graphs in this BBC article would be useful to include in Second Trump tariffs or First Trump tariffs. What's the best way to include them in line with Wikipedia's fair use policies? Take a screenshot of it, recreate the graph myself, etc.? Is there a place on Wikipedia where other people will recreate graphs on request? satkara❈talk 03:01, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your Link isn't working Moxy🍁 03:05, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, thanks. Here: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn48q3150dxo satkara❈talk 04:15, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Satkara There is a graphs lab, where you can request graphs: see WP:GRAPHLAB. However, the BBC site credits the US Census Bureau, so if you can find the originals on their website, they may well be public domain as works of the US government. Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:37, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Satkara: For the first graph, re-create it yourself based on the U.S. government data used by the BBC. If you can, find and cite the actual US government source instead of the vague BBC citation. Your result will be under your copyright and you can put it on Commons. The BBC graph has very few "creative" (i.e., copyrightable) elements, but try to avoid an exact copy of colors or styles. In my opinion BBC did not do any creative "selection" or "arrangement" of this data. The second graph is more problematic, since BBC did some math using their own factors. You can try to go back to the US government data and make your own assessment to make a similar graph. For this graph, also be aware that "selection and arrangement" are copyrightable creative elements, so do not do it exactly the same way. -Arch dude (talk) 12:48, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks everyone - @Arch dude @Michael D. Turnbull @Moxy! Appreciate the help and all of you being here and making Wikipedia a more welcoming place :) satkara❈talk 16:24, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding that, based on what I've seen since I started watching this page a few weeks ago as a result of asking my own question. Musiconeologist (talk) 17:15, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi wikis,how convert this logo (File:CUPET Logo.svg) to a Non-free logo ,this logo is not a simple logo ,it’s a complex,is the same logo deleted in Commons (File:Screenshot (File CUPET Logo.png deletion log).png) i see in my watchlist in Wikimedia Commons,the User:Túrelio (Administrator of Wikimedia Commons) deleted the logo and say:Non-free logo above Threshold of originality. (Google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:07, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AbchyZa22, I found another non free file and copied the code, does it look right now? TSventon (talk) 13:05, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you AbchyZa22 (talk) 13:50, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An editor finds a great book or a good article. Maybe they have written it themselves, maybe a friend or a colleague has written it. Or maybe they just think it is great. Then they think about all WP pages where they can put it in the Further reading section. It fits here, it fits there, soon the book is added to five pages or more. Is this perfectly fine? I have read WP:Further reading but I cannot find anything about this. (PS I am a returning editor and sometimes a bit lost.) Lova Falk (talk) 17:06, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think there are two sides to this:

• what the editor adding the book should do
• what later editors finding it should do.

And I think the answer to the first one is probably "suggest it on the talk page, as a potential conflict of interest", and that the answer to the second one is "treat it like any other addition to the list, and assess whether it does indeed belong there".
The edits are likely to look promotional, whether they're intended that way or not.
But those are just my personal thoughts on it, and other people may have different ones. Musiconeologist (talk) 17:34, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Musiconeologist, I find it interesting to read what you think, and I hope more people will weigh in. (BTW So far, I haven't seen any editors spontaneously writing on the Talk page that there could be, or is, a potential conflict of interest.) Lova Falk (talk) 17:54, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SELFCITE suggests that adding a source where you have a COI is acceptable, and I agree with that for sources, since, after all, the contributor has gone to the trouble of expanding the content of the article with the new source as verification. That's not quite the same for further reading, where the author hasn't bothered to add any real content and is coming closer to merely promoting their own work. Hence, in that case, I think that it is better practice to go via the talk page. Mike Turnbull (talk) 18:25, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am making this article: List of Hungarian monarchs

Do we have any way that we can set the image size in mass in each row? It is really boring to set up manually each image size one by one. Like max width or height. OrionNimrod (talk) 22:19, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]