The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:19, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whitney Webber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is not notable, does not meet WP:ATHLETE and does not have enough news coverage. Tarkminas (talk) 21:59, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Sportspeople. Tarkminas (talk) 21:59, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and California. Shellwood (talk) 22:30, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Apparently she did win a gold medal in the 2003 World Rowing Championships, so I get plenty of hits on random sports statistics websites and such, but not seeing anything at in terms of coverage. I think someone created this article along with others like Liane Malcos just to fill out the redlinks, and such articles do not contribute to the value of the encyclopedia. Kylemahar902 (talk) 22:52, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Her gold metal in international champion ship is noticeable achievement and many ghits. BTSfangir1 (talk) 05:50, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Not really. Wikipedia:Notability (sports) requires coverage. Even if she won the gold metal, unless there are reliable sources talking about here, its just not notable enough. All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (Ughhh.... What did I do wrong this time?) 16:29, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 02:41, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I had a good search online and couldn't find any additional sources. --Spacepine (talk) 03:18, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.