Santhi Sathyan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Moved from draft without being reviewed, clearly fails WP:GNG, setting a Guinness world record is not enough to pass the criteria. Theroadislong (talk) 17:21, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India. Shellwood (talk) 17:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I acknowledge that the article may not currently meet notability guidelines. I request that this article be moved back to the **Draft** space instead of being deleted so that I can work on improving it with better sources. Digiflock (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It had previously been returned to draft so that is not an option. Theroadislong (talk) 20:21, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Kerala. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:06, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Given the move history of this article, which originated as the userpage for creator Digiflock (talk · contribs), someone might want to do something about the fact that Talk:Santhi Sathyan contains the type of messages that actually should be on User talk:Digiflock (a user talk page that should not have been moved)… (No opinion or comment on the article itself.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Well, World Records aren't notable here, so stories about doing a non-notable thing only, don't make you notable. Outside of the Record, this person has not done anything we'd consider notable. This is just a non-starter, nothing for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 02:49, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No sign of Notability. Zuck28 (talk) 12:43, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Guinness record does not make the subject notable and the degree of significance of the subject and of role as athlete and trainer is not enough to warrant a page on the subject. Fails WP:GNG. RangersRus (talk) 14:03, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails Notability. Delete as per nominations. Guinness records doesn’t make person notable unless supported by other reliable sources. Rahmatula786 (talk) 03:09, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I note that two sources are reduplicated, so there's actually only five sources, and not one is reliable thus her and her stunt are unverified. Everyone knows that we are not a book of records nor social media. Bearian (talk) 11:10, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]