The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . ✗plicit 03:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revisionist Press (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Incredibly obscure book publisher with 0 sigcov. There's a few passing mentions that accuse this of being a front for the CIA (not joking) and little else, and a handful of complaints over financial issues and a lack of response (also all passing). Its parent company Gordon Press appears to be equally non-notable. The company that bought it, Run for Cover, also appears to be non notable. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Companies. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nomination. Non-notable book publisher. TH1980 (talk) 23:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.