The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 18:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kabi-Kahini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. There is no meaningful content in this article that cannot be covered in the article of the corresponding author. Mopswade (talk) 08:58, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:12, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:12, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• If a book by Nobel Prize for Literature winner Rabindranath Tagore doesn't pass WP:NBOOK criterion 5 then I don't know what would. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:56, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the article tells us nothing other than that the work exists. No reason to have it.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:10, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  The reason is the same as for any other stub about a notable topic: so that someone can find it and add content. That's the whole idea of a wiki. Or maybe you think that life would be much easier for editors if we just deleted everything except articles about Mormons? Phil Bridger (talk) 18:19, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and expand. Satisfies criteria 5 of NBOOK. The author, Rabindranath Tagore won the Nobel Prize for Literature. James500 (talk) 14:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and expand, as with the several other Tagore articles mass-nominated for deletion. Per WP:ARTN, notability is the subject of a topic, not an article. A stub article is perfectly acceptable for notable topics; Johnpacklambert appears to be arguing that all stubs should be deleted. — Toughpigs (talk) 14:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Could the nominator and delete supporters please explain which of these multiple sources isn’t reliable and independent? Mccapra (talk) 15:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep meets WP:NBOOK, notable author's work. Cedix (talk) 19:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.