The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IDP: IELTS Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subsidiary of a non-notable corporation. Orange Mike | Talk 22:51, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe is not notable in America. However, please, notice this is the English Wikipedia. This organisation is very much notable in Australia and East Asia. Indeed, the Governemnt of Australia publicly recognises this body IDP: IELTS Australia. Also, you can find this body across all official IELTS websites:
http://www.chinaielts.org/english/new/media/20090301.jsp,
http://www.ieltsusa.org,
http://www.britishcouncil.org/brussels-ielts-20th-anniversary-release-final-global.doc,
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,23545690-12332,00.html,
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,24496793-12149,00.html

Speedy delete under criteria A7. ---Irbisgreif-(talk | e-mail)-(contribs) 19:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - the coverage I can find is just mentions as part of articles on IELTS. That's not enough to establish this wholly owned subsidiary as notable. -- Whpq (talk) 14:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.