- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Harryhausen: The Lost Movies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:NBOOK - the book is as yet unreleased and the sources are all directly connected with the author. There are also concerns about WP:COI editing Melcous (talk) 14:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- External links added I have noticed significant coverage of the content of this publication in recent weeks. To this end, I have added external sources to this article which show wider coverage and interest in the book, such as conventions and external events relating to its content; I hope that this helps RobertCJ (talk) 08:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)RobertCJ
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:16, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:16, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - promotional material about a book that has not been published - the references are promotions for an unpublished book - the article creator has made few edits outside of John Walsh and Harryhausen - the John Walsh article has been up for deletion and there is a note on the John Walsh article that "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject" (same article creatory) so there may be WP:COI and sockpuppet issues here - maybe after the book has been published and has multiple significant reviews or writeups in reliable sources the article can be recreated - (WP:NFILM says we shouldn't have articles about unmade films, but this is a book about unmade films, so not sure if that guideline applies) - Epinoia (talk) 17:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.