The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 22:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chantal Desjardins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a broadcaster, who has a valid potential claim of notability for her association with a nationally distributed sports channel but lacks the reliable source coverage needed to clear WP:GNG for it. The only references here are a blog entry in the context of her past work as a local radio host, and a glancing namecheck of her existence in a newspaper blurb about her joining Sportsnet -- a job, for the record, from which she was laid off just one year later. And I can't find the depth or breadth of reliable source coverage about her needed to salvage this, either -- even on a Google search, I get namechecks and blogs, not substantive reliable source coverage about her. As always, simply existing as a broadcaster is no automatic guarantee of inclusion in Wikipedia -- the existence of reliable source coverage about her, sufficient to clear GNG, is what determines whether a Wikipedia article gets to happen or not. Bearcat (talk) 17:36, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:26, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep I note [1] and [2] as newer references. Power~enwiki (talk) 02:28, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

She's not the subject of the Globe and Mail reference, but merely has her existence glancingly namechecked in an article about something other than her — and MarketWired is a press release distribution platform, in which the "coverage" was written by her own employer rather than by an independent source. So no, neither of those sources counts for anything at all toward getting her over a notability criterion. Bearcat (talk) 22:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- a nn TV personality; sources above do not meet the WP:SIGCOV bar and are passing mentions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.