This is a usual talk page, and questions can be addressed here. I will be happy to accept questions and I will answer it from here. (Sculture65 (talk) 04:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC))[reply]

For previously archived talk articles, see here.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of drama serials with all four Star Awards acting nominations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holland V.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sculture65. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:A Conversation with Minister, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @RamzyM:, but I didn't take part due to a hefty schedule. Oh well, congratulations to the next batch of U4C on my behalf. I wish them well and success, and I will continue to work on Wikipedia so long if I able to. Sculture65 (talk) 12:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sculture65. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "A Conversation with Minister".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I see you are a major editor for the article, and tbh I'm trying to align it similarly to 2022 Serbian general election, which is a Good Article. So, actually for some stuff you added, like the parties' ideologies, can you also add citations for their respective alignments? Also the table of vacated seats require citations. Try to ensure people don't add mothership links and use reputable sources (like CNA and Straits Times). Thanks.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 03:18, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @ZKang123:, I also want to work on giving some updates to the article and make it more akin to the other popular elections such as the 2024 United States presidential election, 2024 United Kingdom general election, and the 2024 Japanese general election, but I also doing my best to get these articles up to speed. I had a record on helping out doing into the 2020 Singaporean general election and the 2023 Singaporean presidential election, along with some other projects I did that focused on a Singaporean trending topic. If there is anything fell short, such as the Mothership website (though it is also a reputable source), we seek your understanding. Anyway thanks for the message and that prove me that I can do even better in the future. I cannot wait to see how it will end in the election. Cheers. Sculture65 (talk) 15:09, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, just chipping in here as a talkpage stalker haha! In my opinion, despite the news accreditation etc, I do not think Mothership will be a reliable source based on past incidents indicated on its article. Its association with Philip Yeo and George Yeo does make it less neutral. While our MSM has such association as well, on WP:RSN, they are indicated as accepted reliable sources with exceptions, mothership is lower than them in my opinion. If given similar reports among them, I will pick msm over mothership first. ~ JASWE (talk) 11:54, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JASWE, seen your comment. I didn't realize that Mothership was a lower-reputable source, but since that they also provide news sources and also have documented some key topics as such, I've included that anyway. However, learning is part of Wikipedia, so I understand it was everyone that can come to work on the article. Cheers. Sculture65 (talk) 11:01, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's enough controversial points that I personally will not recommend it. While they do have press accreditation from the government, they are allowed to report on news but generally they are behind on reporting compared to CNA, ST etc. There is also the additional of "human interest information" that make it tabloid ish (see their other many human interest information articles). I am not stopping other editors from using it but for me, I can easily find a CNA, ST, 8world, Asiaone article as a replacement most of the time. ~ JASWE (talk) 12:20, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]