Hello, PB987, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

@Significa liberdade Thanks PB987 (talk) 04:57, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade Can you please Review the Draft:2025 Kalat attack. This is a recent event and it should have to be reviewed quickly. This draft then has to be included in the Current events of the news section. Thanks PB987 (talk) 15:57, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out, PB987! I understand it can be frustrating to wait while your draft article is being reviewed. In the meantime, you may want to check out Wikipedia:In the news, which is where Wikipedians discuss which articles should be featured in the current events section of the Main Page. You can also connect with some WikiProjects, which are groups of people interested in similar topics. In this case, you may even connect with the Pakistan WikiProject to see if there's anyone interested in helping develop your draft article. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:37, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade Ok great 👍 PB987 (talk) 16:40, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade The article Draft:2025 Kalat attack has been improved and cited with reliable sources. Can you please review the Draft so i can nominate it to the Wikipedia News. PB987 (talk) 07:42, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Randi Lunnan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norwegian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot I have fixed this Disambiguation link. Thanks for noticing it. PB987 (talk) 20:02, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Goldsztajn were:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#NEWS and Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event for more information.

Not clear that this requires a separate article that could not be covered in Balochistan Liberation Army. The article also contains close paraphrasing of the sources, including sections which appear directly lifted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2025 Kalat attack and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Goldsztajn (talk) 03:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please suggest me so i can merge this article to another article. PB987 (talk) 05:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PB987! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Goldsztajn (talk) 03:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Jeeto Baazi Khel Ke. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Fails WP:NMUSIC. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vestrian24Bio 03:19, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vestrian24Bio I don't think that this page has to move to draft space as the article has the most reliable sources from all over the world. This song was released as the Champions Trophy official anthem by International Cricket Council a cricket governing body. This is Notable also as the song performed by Atif Aslam, an international famous artist. The page was created recently and I don't think that it will meet Notability in Just one Day. I think it has to move to the main space. I created the page because i have the Auto confirmed rights on Wikipedia that i can create pages or move them also. Please take a look at this. Thanks PB987 (talk) 04:55, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:NOTINHERITED, the song should have its independent coverage and there's none. All these sources are either about Champions Trophy or Atif Aslam, not about the song.

Also per WP:NMUSIC, the song should have at least one of the following criteria:

1. The recording has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it.
2. The recording has appeared on any country's national music chart.
3. The recording has been certified gold or higher in at least one country.
4. The recording has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award.
5. The recording was performed in a medium that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article).
6. The recording was in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network.
7. The recording has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or television network.

But, this song does not pass any of it. Vestrian24Bio 05:03, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vestrian24Bio Than this has to be Redirected to the 2025 ICC Champions Trophy Marketing Section. PB987 (talk) 05:06, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay with me. Vestrian24Bio 05:07, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vestrian24Bio Ok Can you plz Do it Yourself. PB987 (talk) 05:09, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Vestrian24Bio 05:12, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dil Wali Gali Mein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dil Wali Gali Mein until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shair (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. "Was released in March 2025?" Are you from the future? If not, you are using false information to create pages. There is already an SPI report, if you continue with placing pages in the mainspace with unreliable sources, there will be an ANI report. CNMall41 (talk) 18:43, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 Do you think that the Provided references are Unreliable PB987 (talk) 18:45, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I said. Just like I have said with other creations you and other related accounts are making. They are non-bylined sources and churnalism. WP:CIR. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 Looking at your contribution, you have long abuse against Television related articles from Different countries. PB987 (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nah. I don't have an issue with television related articles from different countries. I have an issue with SOCKS and UPE from anywhere and everywhere. If you want to make an accusation of bigotry, take it to ANI. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 I'm a new editor and I'm unaware of these. PB987 (talk) 19:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are new, yet you are aware. Not sure what that means. Stop pinging me. Feel free to opine in the SPI but I'm done engaging you in discussion here outside of warnings for editing behavior. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:05, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 What does the SPI mean, in which I'm involved. PB987 (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:18, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Dil Wali Gali Mein. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because of sockpuppetry by Sackiii.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:31, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]