@MiszaBot Hello, I was wondering what the referencing errors were that you mentioned? I have sourced all the content I have added with page numbers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomast48 (talk • contribs) 2025-01-31T10:32:49 (UTC)

I am not MiszaBot, nor do I run that bot (or any other bots). If you have a question about MiszaBot, you should write to the MiszaBot talk page. If you have a question about a specific edit on a page, it's best to use the talk page of that article. -- mikeblas (talk) 15:43, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I cited the OFFICIAL RESULTS. Panteraloud38 (talk) 21:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The reference you wrote was broken, displaying a visible error and also adding the article to the Category:Pages with broken reference names. Looks like someone else has attempted to fix it. Still not quite right, but at least it's now workable and can be cleaned up. -- mikeblas (talk) 23:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Feelings (1997 David Byrne album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:12, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The file is in-use at Feelings (David Byrne album). -- mikeblas (talk) 14:48, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Mike. I saw your comment on Talk:Main Page and am coming here to suggest that you should try out Wikipedia:Convenient Discussions! I saw you had an error in lining up columns which Convenient Discussion makes easier when using a talk page. I do get that Wikipedia has many, many accessibility issues but CD has helped myself read talk pages more easily. Thanks, Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 01:02, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note! I think I'm using Convenient Discussions already. (How can I be sure?) The thing is, it doesn't always work and I often have to drop back to the regular source editor. It's that the "Reply" button (or link, or text ...?) does nothing: clicking it doesn't open the editor window for a new response. No error, no message, no popup. Just nothing. -- mikeblas (talk) 02:04, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mikeblas, So unlike on commons or any other project, you have to press the little circle refresh button that is on the left of your screen if you can see it. You can also view settings for it if you scroll all the way to the bottom of a talk page (like where the “Powered by MediaWiki” thing is) and click “Convenient Discussion settings”. Thanks! Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 02:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mike, if you go to the Vesrix V8 Supercars stats pages you can find where each driver finished each year. Like this link to Terry Finnigan's profile you'll see that in 1997 he finished third in the Privateers Cup. Its a laborious process going through each drivers and forming a finishing order for each year, but it's accurate records from pre-Natsoft era.

Happy to discuss further.Bjcook (talk) 01:20, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK. But I'm not sure why you've told me this. -- mikeblas (talk) 01:32, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You the 1998 table. Bjcook (talk) 02:32, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your sentence no verb.

I think you're talking about the 1998 Australian Touring Car Championship article. Since this issue is about the content of that article, it should be discussed on that article's talk page. See you there! -- mikeblas (talk) 03:05, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Istituto Centrale per gli Archivi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. The external link merely shows that it exists not that it is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 19:59, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. This is a national government agency, so I would've thought it intrinsically notable. Plenty of information is available at it:Istituto Centrale per gli Archivi which can be translated and moved here. I have provided a rough translation of the lede of that article, along with a reference and some other improvements. Also, I removed your {{prod}} template. -- mikeblas (talk) 22:16, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]