• 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,19, 20

I think this is worth a zapping. Might be worth blocking also, the IP is vandalism only.

Kingsmasher678 (talk) 17:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did the revdel, but didn't bother blocking since he's been gone for a couple of hours. Sorry I didn't see this earlier. Joyous! Noise! 20:15, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joyous! Thanks for the revert. That type of vandalism has been happening on a regular basis. I've put in a request for page protection to be increased. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 00:07, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A user you blocked posted a personal attack at Special:Diff/1277327417 on their talk page. I recommend revoking that user's talk page access. Z. Patterson (talk) 00:44, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Yes. Thanks. That's one's a charmer. Joyous! Noise! 00:45, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't appreciate being called "ehitler"!

diff

Kingsmasher678 (talk) 17:33, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Joyous! Noise! 17:41, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!

Kingsmasher678 (talk) 17:42, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why was my edit on the Wine Gums page stating “the reason behind the name remains unknown” removed for silliness? 131.227.156.6 (talk) 23:26, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message! My apologies. I misread your edit. I've restored it, so you don't have to go to the trouble. Joyous! Noise! 23:29, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! 131.227.156.6 (talk) 23:32, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work on anti-vandalism!!

Rexophile (talk) 02:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No one has ever given me a goat before!!! Thank you! And he's already eaten two buttons off my shirt, and untied my shoelaces. Joyous! Noise! 02:21, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for removing vandalism from Betty Loh Ti. We appreciate this, but unfortunately your edit was not successful in restoring the article to its pre-vandalised state. For future reference, it is better to deal with vandalism by checking the article's page history to determine how it appeared before it was vandalised. You can then restore the whole article, or the relevant part of it, to an appropriate earlier version. If you simply delete the visible vandalism then any content removed or overwritten by the vandal is lost. See How to deal with vandalism for details. Thank you.  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 10:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some dude left his email address in an edit summary [1]

Kingsmasher678 (talk) 19:42, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You are a great asset to the English Wikipedia. Salute. Plasticwonder (talk) 05:24, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! That's very kind! Joyous! Noise! 05:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]