Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kearny High School (New Jersey), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Thanksgiving everyone!

Time for the holidays!

TBD

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:6400 & 6524 (Coach USA livery) on Route 24.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. bjh21 (talk) 23:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:New Jersey Transit 6397-a.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 02:25, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:New Jersey Transit 6349-a.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 03:32, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Greenville Garage Lot.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 12:24, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New Jersey Transit 6334-b.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 04:01, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New Jersey Transit 6340-a.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 04:02, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New Jersey Transit 6397-a.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 04:07, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New Jersey Transit 6340-a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New Jersey Transit 6334-b.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to New Jersey Transit Big Tree Garage. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 06:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Jersey Transit Big Tree Garage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Danny5784! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to New Jersey Transit Greenville Garage. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 02:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Jersey Transit Big Tree Garage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Jersey Transit Big Tree Garage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 02:17, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Jersey Transit Greenville Garage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Jersey Transit Greenville Garage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 03:34, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Jersey Transit Kearny Point Garage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Jersey Transit Kearny Point Garage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 03:36, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jlwoodwa was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Jersey Transit Westwood Garage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jlwoodwa (talk) 03:01, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Jersey Transit Westwood Garage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Danny5784. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 21:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC). (You can at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Wikipedias, such as cptdb.ca/wiki, and social media channels such as YouTube, are not acceptable or reliable sources. The NJ Transit website is a primary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Jersey Transit Westwood Garage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:04, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New Jersey Transit 20892-b.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 11:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but there is proof that he gave permission Danny5784 (talk) 13:13, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the evidence of said permission? —C.Fred (talk) 13:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He told me on instagram Danny5784 (talk) 18:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you take New Jersey Transit garages and yards, you can build on this article and gather informations there if you use information at NJ Transit Bus Operations#Divisions, facilities, and operators, you could build a nice article, including the information for the three individual articles up for deletion.Djflem (talk) 12:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But how? Can you help me? Danny5784 (talk) 18:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

merge them; just follow the format of the second and combine it with the first and add the references. All the separate articles will not survive deletion.Djflem (talk) 21:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, your saying to follow the format of the second article I made? Danny5784 (talk) 22:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NO, I'm saying take NJ Transit Bus Operations#Divisions, facilities, and operators format and improve on it, BUT first read Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Citing sources. All the individual articles are garbage that you are wasting time with because they will all be deleted as can be seen at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Transportation. Why do you insist on producing them if you cannot build a decent well written, well referenced article? Your contributions will continue to be rejected (and that's a shame) if you do not familiarize yourself with how Wikipedia works. Djflem (talk) 08:09, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, you should continue working on New Jersey Transit garages and yards because at least there you can bundle all the different sources together to show notability. Individual bus depots are very rarely gonna have enough in-depth coverage to meet notability guidelines. JTtheOG (talk) 09:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If I make an article called: New Jersey Transit garages with no yards included, does it still count for all the info? Danny5784 (talk) 13:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just work on article as it is and change the name later, maybe to NJT bus garages or New Jersey Transit bus garages. (do not capitalise bus or garage). It seems it's about the garages, not the yards. Djflem (talk) 11:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m already starting to make a NJT bus garage article. But, should I have it as this?

== Fairview Garage ==

or this?

=== Fairview Garage === Danny5784 (talk) 13:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you do

==Northern Division==, then do

===Fairview Garage=== Djflem (talk) 09:51, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was gonna make a new article with the bus garages with their routes. Danny5784 (talk) 14:08, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:New Jersey Transit 5742-a.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 10:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Jersey Transit Fairview Garage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Jersey Transit Fairview Garage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 06:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should all be merged into a larger article. This is not notable by itself.Djflem (talk) 12:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 13 Nutley/Belleville/Clifton-Irvington Terminal/Valley Fair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/13 Nutley/Belleville/Clifton-Irvington Terminal/Valley Fair until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 02:37, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 24 Elizabeth/Jersey Gardens-Orange/Erie Loop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24 Elizabeth/Jersey Gardens-Orange/Erie Loop until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 02:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 30 North Arlington-Kearny-Newark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/30 North Arlington-Kearny-Newark until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 02:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NJ Transit Bus Garages And Yards has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tinton5 (talk) 23:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New Jersey Transit 5743-a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 40 Kearny-Jersey Gardens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/40 Kearny-Jersey Gardens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 03:01, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 70 Newark-Livingston/Florham Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/70 Newark-Livingston/Florham Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 03:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New Jersey Transit 5743-a.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New Jersey Transit 5743-a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Danny5784. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guty Carrera, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:12, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 44 VA Hospital/Orange Station-Newark Penn Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/44 VA Hospital/Orange Station-Newark Penn Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, NJ Transit bus garages. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – New Jersey Transit bus garages. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at New Jersey Transit bus garages. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Tinton5 (talk) 06:50, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, New Jersey Transit bus garages. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – NJ Transit bus garages. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at NJ Transit bus garages. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 17:39, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Jersey Transit 6539-6549 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 08:37, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:NJ Transit Bus Fleet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Entirely redlinks with zero indication of notability (Draft:New Jersey Transit 6539-6549 was declined, for example)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:04, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow down with your edits and pay attention to the feedback you have received from other editors. Most of the articles you are creating are about subjects that do not meet the guideline at Wikipedia:Notability. Most also suffer from a lack of reliable sources. Duplicate articles like New Jersey Transit bus garages and NJ Transit Bus Garage Fleet/Routes (both now directed), drafts on clearly non-notable subjects like Draft:New Jersey Transit 6539-6549, and unneeded templates like Template:NJ Transit Bus Fleet (see WP:EXISTING for why a template of redlinks is not useful) waste the time of other editors and do not improve the encyclopedia. You may find that CPTDB or transit.wiki are better fits for you, as they do not have the same notability and sourcing criteria that Wikipedia does. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  voorts (talk/contributions) 23:48, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: socking confirmed by CU. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Jersey Transit 6539-6549 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Jersey Transit 6539-6549 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alansohn (talk) 12:57, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Danny5784! Your additions to New Jersey Transit 6539-6549 have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. C F A 16:28, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I need further clarification Danny5784 (talk) 16:40, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty simple: you cannot just take something from an another website or any place on line and copy it and put it Wikipedia. You cannot just make stuff up and put it Wikipedia. You cannot publish things you may believe to be true without backing it up with reliable sources such as books, newspapers, websites, etc.Djflem (talk) 18:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Danny5784 (talk) 19:28, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to read this policy:Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. It describes that Wikipedia is not a personal website or a place to store information not considered to be encyclopedic. Your user pages seemed to be filled with material that has been decided by the community to not be encyclopaedic and seems the same as many of pages that were deleted. What's your intention? Djflem (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m still doing the improvements but they are from my user page so… Danny5784 (talk) 18:13, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So? So what do you mean? Djflem (talk) 18:16, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The pages I’m doing on my user page and they are from my user page, they are still in develop. Danny5784 (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's just that they have many Wikipedia:Copyright violations. The material (information and format) seems to be copy and pasted directly from the pages of CPTDB. Please re-read info in subject header above where this is explained. Djflem (talk) 08:02, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently there are three bus layover yards for NJT buses. One is in Weehawken. Do you know where the others are? Djflem (talk) 08:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I think they do layovers at Greenville or PABT Danny5784 (talk) 12:46, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to La casa de los famosos season 5, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop your disruptive editing. [1] Telenovelafan215 (talk) 01:08, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:New Jersey Transit fleet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Contains only user sandboxes, which should not be categorized. No articles exist that would belong in this category, and the userspace drafts are unlikely to ever become articles..

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:25, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:NJ Transit bus garages indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:54, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:47, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Have you considered alternative outlets? Sometimes people put unencyclopedic articles in their user space and work on them tirelessly. The community decided that this isn't helpful, and work you do on English Wikipedia needs to ultimately feed into our purpose – creating an online encyclopedia about notable topics. You can't use English Wikipedia as a private web server. One pitfall that people sometimes fall into is thinking that if they write an article well enough, it will eventually fall into line with our policies. However, no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. That means that if reliable sources don't discuss a topic, neither do we. Thus, one might consider putting this information on a different website. Some of these websites can be access using your Wikipedia account.

If you don't have any interest in editing outside your own user space, there's a real possibility that you will be blocked for not being here to build an encyclopedia. This is currently being discussed at WP:ANI. If you're here to contribute to encyclopedia articles in mainspace, it would benefit you to comment at the ANI discussion and clearly say that. And then to put your efforts into that, of course. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:05, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Danny5784 (talk) 22:16, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  voorts (talk/contributions) 00:24, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Danny5784 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I want to be unblocked because I am here to build an encyclopedia and to make Wikipedia a better place to see news articles from. Also, anything from my sandbox is mine and still in develop. I also want to fix any mistakes that were made in articles that people can't understand or they can't read what it means. Thank you. Danny5784 (talk) 01:56, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:30, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Danny5784,

User pages and sandboxes are not private and belong to the project, not the editor. Generally other editors won't edit another editor's User pages but they are not like your own private blog or website and you don't have "ownership" over them. There are special CSD criteria just to handle deletion of User pages especially CSD U5 which is for using Wikipedia User's pages are your own personal webhost. If you want to retain the content on them, I suggest you copy it and paste it somewhere off-Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:59, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[Unblock request removed as per below conversation]

(Non-administrator comment) Hi @Danny5784:, can you please read WP:Guide to appealing blocks as you've not submitted a very thorough appeal.

You need to explain what you did wrong, why it caused problems and then how you'll avoid doing the same thing going forwards. You've been given these answers on this page, but you need to be able to find them and put the pieces together yourself.

Just saying that you understand your mistake without any further detail doesn't prove any of those things. Blocks are to prevent further disruption, you need to be able to prove that you won't cause the same problems if you're unblocked, and right now you're nowhere near close to doing that, I'm afraid.

To be as clear as possible, you need to do this:

• Read the guide I've linked
• Read the reasons why you were blocked above
• Explain what you did wrong
• Explain why it was disruptive/against the rules
• Explain exactly what you'll to do avoid that in future (specify what you will or won't do next time).

Please take the time to read through everything and understand what you need to do, because no-one else can do that for you. I don't think your current appeal is likely to be accepted if you don't follow the instructions you've been given, please try to do this before it's declined again. Blue Sonnet (talk) 14:01, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright but, do I make another unblock appeal or no? Danny5784 (talk) 2:02, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Danny5784, if it hasn't been responded to, you can remove an unblock request from your User talk page. I also encourage you to read the guide. It will provide the best guidance on what you need to do. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:30, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

alright thanks! Danny5784 (talk) 14:11, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Danny5784, I noticed you haven't removed your request yet - do you know how to do it or need any help? Blue Sonnet (talk) 17:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I need help. Danny5784 (talk) 18:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've removed it for you! Blue Sonnet (talk) 15:21, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Danny5784 (talk) 15:40, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Danny5784 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked because the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I was blocked for and I will not continue to cause any disruptions and will make useful contributions on articles instead. I also promise to stop doing whatever got me blocked and will make useful edits instead. I will avoid to be making any edits to any pages that was created with my username in the future. I won't do any pages with my user and the title of the article next time in the future and will also understand the consequences or punishments that will get me blocked from Wikipedia again. Danny5784 (talk) 00:56, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I would like to be unblocked because the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I was blocked for and I will not continue to cause any disruptions and will make useful contributions on articles instead. I also promise to stop doing whatever got me blocked and will make useful edits instead. I will avoid to be making any edits to any pages that was created with my username in the future. I won't do any pages with my user and the title of the article next time in the future and will also understand the consequences or punishments that will get me blocked from [[Wikipedia]] again. [[User:Danny5784|Danny5784]] ([[User talk:Danny5784#top|talk]]) 00:56, 18 February 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to be unblocked because the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I was blocked for and I will not continue to cause any disruptions and will make useful contributions on articles instead. I also promise to stop doing whatever got me blocked and will make useful edits instead. I will avoid to be making any edits to any pages that was created with my username in the future. I won't do any pages with my user and the title of the article next time in the future and will also understand the consequences or punishments that will get me blocked from [[Wikipedia]] again. [[User:Danny5784|Danny5784]] ([[User talk:Danny5784#top|talk]]) 00:56, 18 February 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to be unblocked because the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I was blocked for and I will not continue to cause any disruptions and will make useful contributions on articles instead. I also promise to stop doing whatever got me blocked and will make useful edits instead. I will avoid to be making any edits to any pages that was created with my username in the future. I won't do any pages with my user and the title of the article next time in the future and will also understand the consequences or punishments that will get me blocked from [[Wikipedia]] again. [[User:Danny5784|Danny5784]] ([[User talk:Danny5784#top|talk]]) 00:56, 18 February 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

(Non-administrator comment) Hi again @Danny5784:, you're going to have to be much more specific before you can be unblocked. You need to explain which of your actions were disruptive, why it was disruptive, then go over the exact steps you'll take to avoid doing that in future.

You're almost there, but I think you should take some more time to read through the notices and links above to fully understand what happened. Several issues were raised here and you need to show that you understand and won't repeat each one of them. I'll be honest, there's a lot so it'll take a while.

When you've done this, you can add either edit your appeal in the template, or just add this missing information as a reply below this comment (much easier). Blue Sonnet (talk) 01:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The actions that were disrupted were any pages that had my user on it. It was disruptive because it had things from CPTDB and copyrights also. The steps I’ll take to avoid being blocked in the future is to not contribute to any articles that have my user on it and to edit only the articles that don’t have my user on it. Danny5784 (talk) 13:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what you mean when you say "articles that have [your] user on it"? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:22, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What I mean is that articles that have my user name like for example: User:Danny5784/[article name] are the ones that were disrupted. Danny5784 (talk) 11:41, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Ah ok, so the problem was that you created a lot of sandboxes (almost forty!) that weren't suitable as articles. So it's good that you won't continue to do that.

That said, it's ok to have one or two as testing grounds for future edits, but you need to remember that they must follow the same rules as "normal" articles.

So no copyright violations (even though they're sandboxes, they're still on Wikipedia and visible to anyone), no using them to store anything that isn't suitable for Wikipedia in general, etc. Whilst space on here isn't really "limited" from an individual editors perspective, it's good to think of it that way so you don't accidentally misuse it.

The other recommendation in the first ANI I saw was that you only submit new articles via the AFC process, so they can be checked beforehand. If you do this, try to limit yourself to only a couple as you don't want to overwhelm the system & it'll make it easier to remember what you're doing.

Since there were so many concerns, would you be happy to stick to smaller edits for a while, so you can learn the building blocks for what makes a good article? That might be a good idea to present to an admin as part of your appeal.

You can find lots of ways to help & there are even specific project pages if there is a particular subject or area that you're really interested in?

Or you can start small with the Typo Team, which I've helped out with myself - there are pages where you can look for non-neutral words that need changing to neutral ones (really good for learning the right tone to use when describing different things), fix commonly misspelled words or formatting, there's lots of stuff you can do! Blue Sonnet (talk) 14:32, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would be happy to stick with smaller edits. Danny5784 (talk) 18:52, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Great! I'm not sure if an admin might have any other questions so I'll leave this in their hands now. There's a bit of a backlog so please be patient!

In the meantime you can have a look through the various How-to pages (especially this Close paraphrasing essay) - this'll mean you're prepared for any more questions & are working towards becoming a better editor whilst you're waiting for a decision.

I don't know if it's accessible whilst you're blocked, but The Wikipedia Adventure is another resource that'll help you grow as an editor.

Good luck! Blue Sonnet (talk) 03:03, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's... good... but there's also stuff like this. The socking and the copyright violations are kind of a lot on top of everything else. What would you edit about, if you were unblocked? It looks to me like so far effectively all of your edits have been on non-notable topics, things like inventorying every single bus in New Jersey for some reason. Wikipedia isn't the place for that kind of thing, but there's surely some other wiki you could work on. -- asilvering (talk) 07:14, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) ...aaand this is why the actual unblock assessment is done by an admin - I'm still learning about Wikipedia myself & wasn't sure how to address this part (hence the "more questions" comment).

@Danny5784 I'm going to leave this discussion now as I've done what I can, but there are still several concerns you need to address with an admin.

You could create or join a transport-based Wiki/Fandom project, as suggested above, if that's what you're truly passionate about? Blue Sonnet (talk) 10:45, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If I was unblocked, I would edit some pages that are in reality shows and edit the NJ Transit Bus Fleet page because there is an error there which 25201-25202 are not assigned to garages yet. Danny5784 (talk) 11:59, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Danny5784. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Guty Carrera".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:11, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Danny5784 (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There was some short bio of this actor Guty Carrera because there wasn't enough info. Danny5784 (talk) 00:57, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]