Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet
It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.
This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.
Doing Today:. Coding For Martin, then for Walter. You know. Real life stuff. also: Jogging out in the fresh air. :-)
/Lost functionalities. Contrary to what you might expect, Wikipedia has lost several functions and abilities over time. Here's a list.
The digital ice age <- however, the solutions proposed here can at times be illegal. (except if you were backing up most wikipedias, of course. Except en.wikipedia, technically.)
User:Demi/SuperTextPopupHistoryAnnotate. The name sucks. The description of the idea sucks. But if you manage to read it anyway, the actual described concept rocks. I wonder if I could try this at some point? USC now has implemented something...
that might interact in an interesting way with this - USC's system color-codes an article according to the "trustworthiness" of its author as determined by how long that author's edits tend to last... Demi's proposal would change the dynamics of how long an author's edits would tend to stick around, so watching the interactions between the two systems would be terrifically amusing. <- mel's writing ;-)
who runs wikipedia , rereading some of Aaron Swartz's writing. His thoughts are spot on. :-)
effect of voice chat on games - "Those who used text-only chat experienced 'drops in trust and happiness' amongst their fellow players; those who used voice chat did not.". This also works in other online communities. Mediation becomes a lot easier with voice available.
OODA_Loop, I often try to work quicky, and get inside other people's decision cycle. Originally this is a method designed for warfare to confuse people and force them to mis-react. You can also turn it around and use it to enlighten people, and cause them to react well. I worry that sometimes perhaps I don't quite manage to pull that off.
User:Zenwhat/Sandbox Ooh, very pretty, I hope it shows up in mainspace. How many people put that much work into anything? --Kim Bruning (talk) 13:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC) Awwww, where did that go?
I hereby award this jade bi disc for the honorary degree of Bachelor of Imperial Music 《音樂生員》 (BImpMus) by The Order of Rites and Music 【禮樂勳章】 to Mr Badagnani for contributions in and the defence of the Guqin article. Awarded by: Charlie Huang 【正矗昊】 21:05, 20 April 2006 (UTC)File:Barbara-Earl.jpgI hereby award you the Dame Barbara Cartland Award for Prolificacy, in recognition of your myriad contributions to the project. Awarded by Bhumiya (said/done) 02:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC)The Sandwich of Exceptional Excellence Specially made with a meat-free Tofu substitute (Potato Salad of Congeniality cluster, 1st. class) In Panis, Veritas. Awarded to Badagnani for your exceptional contributions to David Blanasi, a new article desperately in need of help. Thanks! Doc Tropics 21:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
About me
Note: I only rarely put effort into my user page, so the content of this page has probably not be reviewed or checked or updated recently.
Wikipedia contributor since 2006.
If you see a typo or glitch here, please feel free to fix it, and thanks to those who already have.
