GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:La Querida (mansion)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 05:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 01:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

My biggest concern is the lack of an architecture section, but the article is solid and has a good source mix in the Kennedy section. I also have some improvements to source citations to consider. Ping me when addressed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@12george1 Are you done with the changes? The new Architecture section looks great. I contributed another clipping so Graulich is complete with page 1I; I'd have gone whole hog and clipped the whole of page 4I in one gulp instead of three separate clippings. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Sammi Brie Yes, I am. That seems to be it for the Architecture section, which actually ended up being larger than I expected. Thanks for the review!--12george1 (talk) 07:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

  • One of these nominees (WTVX) is in the same area as the instant article. Who knows, someone might once have watched channel 34 in that house in the 80s or 90s!

Copy changes

I went looking for an Architecture section but didn't find it. I understand this property has had trouble being listed and reports may have been pre-internet, but a discussion of architectural features somewhere is merited. Right now, there's very limited and scattered info in this article about modifications and general style.

Lead

  • "Mediterranean Revival style" shouldn't be hyphenated. (Also in the early history section)

Kennedy ownership

  • "spacious living quarters." MOS:LOGICAL pull the period outside of the quotation mark. (This occurs a few other times.)
  • Kennedy Sr. also hired Maurice Fatio, an architect with several notable works, to design a two-floor car garage, pool pavilion, and tennis court. He also enlarged the estate by purchasing adjacent land. Drop the "also" in the first sentence to avoid consecutive sentences of "also".
  • The two paragraphs about failed listing attempts awkwardly split the William Kennedy Smith rape trial information. The introductory sentence is two paragraphs before the explanatory content.

Subsequent ownership

  • Nicknaming the house Castillo del Mar ("castle by the sea"), the Castles retained furnishings from the Kennedys in several rooms, he added fireplaces and replaced some windows and doors. Comma splice, and the "he" is unclear because it's "the Castles" and not "Castle".
  • Hyphenate "15-year"
  • The Florida Times-Union attribution should be to the Palm Beach Daily News.
  • In June 2020, Goldman sold La Querida to its current owners, Carl and Mary Jane Panattoni for $70 million. Add a comma after "Panattoni" to complete the appositive.

Sourcing and spot checks

  • [16] appears to be reprinted from The New York Times. The original is in TimesMachine (paywall) [1] as "Kennedy Plans to Appoint Harriman a Roving Envoy: Roosa, New York Banker, to Manage U.S. Debt—Landis Is Given Job" by W.H. Lawrence, Dec. 30, 1960, pages 1 and 8.
  • [18] should attribute The Palm Beach Post as the original publication, having apparently been syndicated to The Florida Times-Union.
  • [28] should be Atlanta, not Atlantic. (It looks like this is a joint Sunday edition and the paper should be credited as The Atlanta Journal/The Atlanta Constitution.)

Reviewed: 1, 2, 16, 17, 29. No textual issues.

Images

There is one PD-USGov image and two images from the Florida Memory Project. A fourth image is CC0 from the nominator. Encouragement: Add alt text to images for accessibility purposes.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bunnypranav talk 11:36, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/WPEC
  • Comment: If possible, I would like for this hook to appear on the main page on January 20 (Inauguration Day in the United States) due to the Winter White House in Palm Beach bit
Improved to Good Article status by 12george1 (talk) and NitoNun (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 45 past nominations.

12george1 (talk) 04:54, 10 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Recent GA, long enough, no other eligibility issues. Fully sourced with no article issues. The hook is not clearly stated with citation in the article, though (the phrase "Winter White House" appears only in the lead section and not in the fully cited body). The hook is interesting should be fine for Inauguration day, although I am not sure we can currently guarantee such date requests. I have removed a link from the hook to avoid MOS:SEAOFBLUE and also because JFK is quite well known. QPQ has been done. Overall but should be an easy fix. —Kusma (talk) 16:53, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No tags for this post.