This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
Requested move 9 March 2020
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
– Statistics (this year, last year) show that the song is way more viewed than the album. Also, the album of the same name has four singles but doesn't seem to make much impact that the song has done. Therefore, the album doesn't qualify as primary topic, so either the song is primary topic, or the two-entry dabpage should do if neither is primary topic. George Ho (talk) 20:58, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. The song is clearly the more popular topic, and considering I can't find an entry for the album at Google Trends, it appears that the majority of people searching "How Bizarre" will be seeking the song and not the album. ResPM come to my window21:50, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support 1st, oppose 2nd - Disambiguate both. Primary swaps are risky, as they can interfere with incoming links (both within Wikipedia and from external searche engines, etc,). I suspect this is a WP:NOPRIMARY situation, but disambiguating both for a while will later give us a clearer picture of the actual usage of either, and allow for links to be cleaned up and settled down. -- Netoholic@01:54, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
