This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips Military history: Maritime / British / European / Early Modern / American Revolution This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force British military history task force European military history task force Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800) American Revolutionary War task force Shipwrecks High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Shipwreck-related priority open tasks: To Do Lady Elizabeth (1879) Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed! Improve grammar Add any additions if needed Still adding more information Discuss desired additions -None Hampshire Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Underwater diving Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Underwater divingWikipedia:WikiProject Underwater divingTemplate:WikiProject Underwater divingUnderwater diving Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

An image used in this article, File:Stern Royal George 1756.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:13, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An article^[1] claims that the diving helmet used by salvagers was invented by Augustus Siebe and not by the Deane brothers themselves. Are there any sources to indicate otherwise?

Anttix (talk) 02:53, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Realising that the ship was settling in the water, orders were given to move the guns back into position to restore the ship's balance.

The first clause in the preceding sentence appears to modify "orders," and thus is a dangling modifier. Sca (talk) 13:02, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The section "Loss" states: "On 28 August 1792 Royal George was preparing to sail...". The year should be 1782. 175.39.206.205 (talk) 23:21, 20 July 2014‎