This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force British military history task force European military history task force World War I task force World War II task force Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips More information: /  This article lacks a ship infobox. You can help by adding {{Infobox ship begin}} to the article and filling in the information. A usage guide is available. Do not place a blank infobox template into the article.

@PrinceTortoise Woffio (talk) 01:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Woffio. The simple answer to your question is that some subjects are not considered notable enough for their own article. To quote from the official explanation for why this is the case: We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a definition of that topic. If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about the subject, that subject does not qualify for a separate page, but should instead be merged into an article about a larger topic or relevant list. If Belgol-class tankers are notable, then it is my opinion that any information related to the HMS Belgol should go there instead.

If you are convinced that the HMS Belgol does meet the requirements of the general notability guideline, you are permitted to remove the notice I added; doing so will temporarily (and maybe permanently) prevent the article from being deleted. PrinceTortoise (he/him • poke) 02:05, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: The article seems to be adequately referenced and the vessel seems to have had a varied career. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 11:01, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]