Brabham BT19 is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 19, 2014.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 4, 2007 Good article nominee Listed September 12, 2007 Peer review Reviewed October 8, 2007 Featured article candidate Promoted A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 5, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the Brabham BT19 driven by Jack Brabham was the first car bearing its driver's name to win a Formula One world championship race? Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia Mid‑importance Brabham BT19 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Automobiles Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Brands Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Formula One High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information. View the task list Discuss the project Help out with Portal:Formula OneFormula OneWikipedia:WikiProject Formula OneTemplate:WikiProject Formula OneFormula One High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. British Motorsport Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject British MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject British MotorsportBritish Motorsport Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Image:Repco brabham logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted, at least once, and possibly twice, since this message was left. FU rationales for all three articles the logo appears in. 4u1e (talk) 09:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with FA standards, but surely the infobox should feature an image of the car, not the company's logo? There's a perfectly good image in the article already that would go there - it's not like we're lacking a decent one. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. As I had a photo of the car on display at the National Sports Museum, I have uploaded it to commons and put it in the infobox; the logo is now elsewhere in the article. Bahnfrend (talk) 14:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's the current position on the car's location? I was thinking of selecting this for TFA - after all, it's been waiting a while now - but the situation really needs to be updated first. Bencherlite^Talk 00:09, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I followed the link to National Sports Museum which in turn had a link to its official website and found a picture of the car here where its mentioned in a Jack Brabham exhibit. It was a pretty simple exercise. Did you try that? --Falcadore (talk) 07:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I found that page, but that particular page is from 2011, it seems, so I wanted to know what the current position is (if different) e.g. if it was provided for an exhibition on a temporary basis or whether the museum was its permanent home. After all, the article says it's on loan, which doesn't necessarily mean that it would have remained at the NSM, and an "as of 2009" date might suggest a temporary state of affairs. In fact, though, I can't see in the sources that Repco still own it or that it's a loan not a donation - can you help on that front? This doesn't say either way. Bencherlite^Talk 08:08, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]