This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Taiwan Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Writing systems High‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

@Fish bowl, I believe "bopomofo" is generally uncapitalized, such as the case with the analogous terms "alphabet", "abjad", and "abugida". Remsense留 06:41, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok; the article predominantly uses capitalization, which I am not decisively responsible for; not sure why you pinged me specifically? Fish bowl (talk) 03:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I just see you are a frequent recent editor of this article. How do I hallucinate these things? Apologies again. I suppose it was a good idea in the process of polling for consensus anyhow. Apologies. Remsense留 06:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Words like alphabet and abjad are analogous only in the sense of being similarly built etymologically. In English, they are common nouns denoting types of writing systems rather than referring specifically to the Phoenician and the Arabic ones. Conversely, Bopomofo is used in English as a proper name for this specific writing system described in this article so it should be more natural to capitalize it. But it seems to be written either way in practice. It's similar to the situation with Pinyin/pinyin. – MwGamera (talk) 20:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose one concern is it reads unnaturally in context, especially alongside an uncapitalized "pinyin". Remsense留 21:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]