POV

An IP editor 205.201.251.61 is on a tear today, editing this article and National Cattlemen's Beef Association. I'm not sure these edits are WP:NPOV. These controversies properly belong in the article Commodity checkoff program. Have a look and come to your own conclusion. Rhadow (talk) 18:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression of free marketplace has a clear POV. The section can stay, but the title needs to rewritten in an encyclopedic style. Rhadow (talk) 14:33, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1 sentence article does not assert notability nor a single source to go with it helps. It needs more than that. SpacedFarmer (talk) 07:16, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that can be a reason for merge based on the information page you linked, but merging just because something is short doesn't mean it isn't notable. And that fact that it has not been expanded does not mean it won't. There are plenty of sources which can be used to expand it which can be found online. I think I would say a merge would be appropriate if it couldn't be expanded based on the sourcing. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:08, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No tags for this post.