This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Suppression of free marketplace has a clear POV. The section can stay, but the title needs to rewritten in an encyclopedic style. Rhadow (talk) 14:33, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that can be a reason for merge based on the information page you linked, but merging just because something is short doesn't mean it isn't notable. And that fact that it has not been expanded does not mean it won't. There are plenty of sources which can be used to expand it which can be found online. I think I would say a merge would be appropriate if it couldn't be expanded based on the sourcing. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:08, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]