Former good article nomineeAaron Swartz was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
In the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 6, 2006Articles for deletionKept
December 11, 2018Good article nomineeNot listed
January 5, 2020Good article nomineeNot listed
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on January 13, 2013.
Current status: Former good article nominee


Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2025

change source 166 to this up-to-date link. Archived link can be kept. https://www.chicagotribune.com/2016/01/17/internet-activist-aaron-swartz-died-3-years-ago-but-his-open-access-push-thrives/ PhoenixIsOk (talk) 23:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: Source numbers can change if another reference is added before it in the article, please reopen the request while mentioning the specific source that needs to be changed. Shadow311 (talk) 18:54, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prodigy

Debianize has disputed the description of Swartz as a "prodigy". So I am opening a discussion so they can explain their reasoning for disputing the description.


Sources that describe Swartz as a prodigy

Sources found at The Wikipedia Library

When you have multiple sources from a diverse set of reliable sources that describe Swartz as a prodigy, it is WP:DUE for inclusion in this article. Isaidnoway (talk) 15:19, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Correct Aaron Swartz Day

At the end of the "Legacy" section, Aaron Swartz day should be November 8th, not November 11th. His birthday was November 8th. Michaeljosh87 (talk) 01:05, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Changed, thanks. (CC) Tbhotch 01:29, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No tags for this post.