Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 24 hours may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 1 section is present.

Hello there, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I wanted to let you know that I have declined your G1 speedy deletion nomination of Chiqui Chiqui because the article does not meet the G1 speedy deletion criteria. G1 only "applies to pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history". However, I have deleted the article under G12 because it is created entirely from copyrighted material. Please let me know if you have any follow up questions regarding this deletion. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:27, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Yeah the article (to me at least) didn't sound all that coherent/encyclopaedic, but I see that G12 is definitely more appropriate here. Thanks for letting me know. Have a good day. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 19:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedactedHumanoid, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:45, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you. I will read over WP:NGEO to get better acquainted with, well, WP:NGEO. Can you tell me how long have I been granted NPR rights for? I don't think you specified. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 20:17, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's now indefinite (congrats). The permission is however removed after extended periods of inactivity as a security precaution, but can typically be re-conferred without issue in those cases once you're back. Regarding NGEO, the specific issue with the series of articles I pointed out is that they're about neighborhoods, not stand-alone places like a village or city that has distinct legal recognition; if they meet GNG they should get an article, but if they don't there's likely a better page to merge that information to. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. So articles about neighborhoods/districts don't meet WP:NGEO, but articles about things like villages and other such settlements do meet NGEO? RedactedHumanoid (talk) 20:44, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, although villages/settlements without legal recognition (a nebulous concept itself) are a point of some disagreement and interpretation (although they're also relatively rare). There's also historically been issues with people misinterpreting census documents in other languages and labeling things as villages when they were in fact post offices, intersections, etc. (off the top of my head this was particularly an issue for Iran and Russia, which would list the more-or-less random census collection dropoff sites in large, sparse rural regions in a way that made people confuse them for populated places) _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:23, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Thanks again for the indefinite NPR rights, have a nice day. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 21:25, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]