User talk:Bluppyt789
Welcome!
Hi Bluppyt789! I noticed your contributions to Deaths in 2025 and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Renewal6 (talk) 20:45, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
Removal of talk page content at 2028 United States presidential election
Please do not remove sections on the talk page at Talk:2028 United States presidential election. Talk page discussions should be archived, which is an automatic process once the discussion becomes inactive. Removal of these sections like you did also removes comments by other users, which is against Wikipedia policy. Thank you! Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 16:49, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I won’t do that again. Could you possibly look into the Steve Bannon talk page I posted though? Bluppyt789 (talk) 16:52, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- Also, please stop spamming random characters on your talk page. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:29, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- I’m trying to reach 500 edits since I lost access to my old extended confirmed account Bluppyt789 (talk) 01:30, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- That is considered Gaming the system and is not permitted. You can ask for extended confirmed status at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Extended confirmed if you do have an account you lost access to. Though I think the gaming here won't look good. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:33, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- It looks like it was not properly formatted go to Wikipedia:Requests for permissions and hit the "add request" link next to the extended confirmed option. Although you will probably have to say what your previous account was. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:40, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- That is considered Gaming the system and is not permitted. You can ask for extended confirmed status at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Extended confirmed if you do have an account you lost access to. Though I think the gaming here won't look good. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:33, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- I’m trying to reach 500 edits since I lost access to my old extended confirmed account Bluppyt789 (talk) 01:30, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Also, please stop spamming random characters on your talk page. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:29, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2028 United States presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
Your edits at Massad Boulos and Elon Musk
There's absolutely zero reason to remove the serving with Elon Musk or serving with Massad Boulos part, it's technically censorship (see here). If you don't have a reason, please self-revert. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 05:04, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Censorship?! Serving implies that they are currently doing their job with the other person. And since Elon is done, he is no longer serving. I am not self reverting. 174.199.97.65 (talk) 13:17, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- You shouldn't reply if you are not the user themselves (or if you really are the user, sign back in, it's considered admittance of WP:SOCKPUPPETRY). This is not your matter. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 17:56, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- They are I just forgot to sign in. Bluppyt789 (talk) 17:57, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- You shouldn't reply if you are not the user themselves (or if you really are the user, sign back in, it's considered admittance of WP:SOCKPUPPETRY). This is not your matter. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 17:56, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Where are the references?
Can you please provide a few sources to tannahill's official retirement, I have not seen any. In fact [1] indicates otherwise. Dafootballguy (talk) 18:58, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- Check retirement, he says he’s retired in countless sources Bluppyt789 (talk) 18:59, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- And that source was from last season in march Bluppyt789 (talk) 19:00, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- I saw a source from this year that claims he hasn't officially retired but acknowledged that he probably won't return, not that he is retired. Dafootballguy (talk) 19:02, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- Check retirement. Plus here's another one https://www.newsweek.com/sports/nfl/exclusive-ryan-tannehill-on-retirement-patriots-rise-and-greatest-qbs-ever-11041819
- Unless you find a source claiming otherwise, it will remain as it is. Bluppyt789 (talk) 19:05, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- how is this [[2]] Dafootballguy (talk) 19:09, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- Same source you provided earlier but posted on a different website. From last season. Bluppyt789 (talk) 19:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- Wasn't aware, give me about 2 minutes to find something else. Dafootballguy (talk) 19:11, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- [[3]]Dafootballguy (talk) 19:14, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- This doesn't even mention Tannehill Bluppyt789 (talk) 19:16, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry site redirected Dafootballguy (talk) 19:20, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- This doesn't even mention Tannehill Bluppyt789 (talk) 19:16, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- [[3]]Dafootballguy (talk) 19:14, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- Wasn't aware, give me about 2 minutes to find something else. Dafootballguy (talk) 19:11, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- Same source you provided earlier but posted on a different website. From last season. Bluppyt789 (talk) 19:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- how is this [[2]] Dafootballguy (talk) 19:09, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- I saw a source from this year that claims he hasn't officially retired but acknowledged that he probably won't return, not that he is retired. Dafootballguy (talk) 19:02, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- And that source was from last season in march Bluppyt789 (talk) 19:00, 21 December 2025 (UTC)