Turco-Mongol tradition

The Turco-Mongol or Turko-Mongol tradition was an ethnocultural synthesis that arose in Asia during the 13-14th century among the ruling elites of the Golden Horde and the Chagatai Khanate. The ruling Mongol elites of these khanates eventually assimilated into the Turkic populations that they conquered and ruled over, thus becoming known as Turco-Mongols. These elites gradually adopted Islam, as well as Turkic languages, while retaining Mongol political and legal institutions.[1]

The Chinggisid uluses included the Kazakhs, the Shaybanid Uzbeks, the Crimean Tatars, the Manghits/Noghays, and the Chagatayans (including the Moghuls and the Timurids). These groups shared a common language (Turkic), a political ideology based on Mongol traditions, dynastic descent from Genghis Khan, an ethnic identity described as Turco-Mongols or “Mongol Turks” (Türk-i Mughūl), and adherence to Sunni Islam. In the post-Mongol period, these politico-ethnic formations continued to dominate a vast territory stretching from Crimea in the west to the Tian Shan mountains in the east, and from Southern Siberia in the north to Northern India in the south.[2]

Asia in 1335

The Turco-Mongols founded many Islamic successor states after the collapse of the Mongol khanates, such as the Kazakh Khanate, the Tatar khanates that succeeded the Golden Horde (e.g., Crimean Khanate, Astrakhan Khanate, Khanate of Kazan), and the Timurid Empire, which succeeded the Chagatai Khanate in Central Asia. Babur (1483–1530), a Turco-Mongol prince and a descendant of Timur, founded the Mughal Empire, which ruled much of the Indian subcontinent.[3][4] The Turks and Tatars also ruled part of Egypt, exercising political and military authority during the Mamluk Sultanate.[5][6][7][8][9][10]

Especially among the successors of Chagatai Khanate, these Turco-Mongol elites of Karluk ethnicities became patrons of the Turco-Persian tradition, which was the predominant culture amongst the Muslims of Central Asia at the time. In subsequent centuries, the Turco-Persian culture was carried on further by the conquering Turco-Mongols to neighbouring regions, eventually becoming the predominant culture of a good part of the ruling and elite classes of South Asia (Indian subcontinent), specifically North India (Mughal Empire), Central Asia and the Tarim Basin (Northwest China) and large parts of West Asia (Middle East).[11][3][4]

Antecedents

Before the time of Genghis Khan, Turkic and Mongolic peoples exchanged words with each other, with Turkic languages being more active than Mongolic.[12][clarification needed] Extensive lexical borrowings from Proto-Turkic into the Proto-Mongolic language occurred from at latest the first millennium BCE. Turkic and Mongolic languages share extensive borrowed similarities in their personal pronouns, among other lexical similarities, which seem to date to before this era and already existed before the breakup of the Turkic people around 500 BCE.[12] A still more ancient period of prolonged language contact between Turkic and Mongol languages is indicated by further and more fundamental phonotactic, grammatical, and typological similarities (e.g. synchronic vowel harmony, lack of grammatical gender, extensive agglutination, highly similar phonotactic rules and phonology).[12][original research?]

In the past, these similarities were attributed to a genetic relationship and led to the widespread acceptance of an Altaic language family. More recently, due to the lack of a definitive demonstration of a genetic relationship, these similarities have been divided into these three known periods of language contact. The similarities have led to the proposal of a Northeast Asian sprachbund instead, which also includes the Tungusic, Koreanic, and Japonic language families, although Turkic and Mongolic display the most extensive similarities. According to recent aggregation and research, there are doublets, which are considered to be the same in terms of their roots, found in the vocabulary in Mongolian language and Turkic loanwords. Also, words of Turkic origin are the most common loanwords in Mongolian vocabulary.[13]

Language

Kipchak

Following the Mongol conquests, the ruling Mongol elites of the Mongol successor states began a process of assimilation with the non-Mongol populations that they ruled over. The population of the Golden Horde was largely a mixture of Turks and Mongols who adopted Islam later, as well as smaller numbers of Finno-Ugric peoples, Alans, Slavs, and people from the Caucasus, among others (whether Muslim or not).[14][failed verification]

Most of the Horde's population was Turkic: Kipchaks, Cumans, Volga Bulgars, Khwarezmians, and others. The Horde was gradually Turkified and lost its Mongol identity, while the descendants of Batu's original Mongol warriors constituted the upper class.[15][better source needed] They were commonly called Tatars by Russians and other Europeans. Russians preserved this common name for this group down to the 20th century. Whereas most members of this group identified themselves by their ethnic or tribal names, most also considered themselves to be Muslims. Most of the population, both sedentary and nomadic, adopted the Kypchak language, which developed into the regional languages of Kypchak groups after the Horde disintegrated.

Karluk

In the Chagatai Khanate, the Turkic language that was adopted by the Mongol elites became known as the Chagatai language, a descendant of Karluk Turkic. The Chagatai language was the native language of the Timurid dynasty, a Turco-Mongol dynasty which gained power in Central Asia after the decline of the Chagatai khans. Chagatai is the predecessor of the modern Karluk branch of Turkic languages, which includes Uzbek and Uyghur.[16]

Religion

The Turco-Mongol conqueror Timur made Samarkand the capital of his empire

The Mongols during the period of the early Mongol conquests and the conquests of Genghis Khan largely followed Tengrism. However, the successor states of the Mongol Empire, the Ilkhanate, Golden Horde and Chagatai Khanate ruled over large Muslim populations. The Ilkhanate and Chagatai Khanate in particular ruled over Muslim-majority populations in Iran and Central Asia, respectively.[citation needed]

In the Golden Horde, Uzbeg (Öz-Beg) assumed the throne in 1313 and adopted Islam as the state religion. He proscribed Buddhism and Shamanism among the Mongols in Russia, thus reversing the spread of the Yuan culture. By 1315, Uzbeg had successfully Islamicized the Horde, killing Jochid princes and Buddhist lamas who opposed his religious policy and succession of the throne. Uzbeg Khan continued the alliance with the Mamluks begun by Berke and his predecessors. He kept a friendly relationship with the Mamluk Sultan and his shadow Caliph in Cairo. After a long delay and much discussion, he married a princess from his family to Al-Nasir Muhammad, Sultan of Egypt. Under Uzbeg and his successor Jani Beg (1342–1357), Islam, which among some of the Turks in Eurasia had deep roots going back into pre-Mongol times, gained general acceptance, though its adherents remained tolerant of other beliefs.[citation needed]

The Northern Yuan dynasty and Turco-Mongol residual states and domains by the 15th century

In order to successfully expand Islam, the Mongols built mosques and other "elaborate places" requiring baths—an important element of Muslim culture. Sarai attracted merchants from other countries. The slave trade flourished due to strengthening ties with the Mamluk Sultanate. Growth of wealth and increasing demand for products typically produce population growth, and so it was with Sarai. Housing in the region increased, which transformed the capital into the centre of a large Muslim Sultanate.[citation needed]

In the Chagatai Khanate, Mubarak Shah converted to Islam, and over time, the Chagatai elite became entirely Islamized. The Chagatai Khanate was succeeded by the Timurid Empire in Central Asia, founded by the Turco-Mongol warrior Timur. According to John Joseph Saunders, Timur was "the product of an Islamized and Iranized society", and not steppe nomadic.[17] To legitimize his conquests, Timur relied on Islamic symbols and language, referred to himself as the "Sword of Islam", and patronized educational and religious institutions. He converted nearly all the Borjigin leaders to Islam during his lifetime. Timur decisively defeated the Christian Knights Hospitaller at the Siege of Smyrna, styling himself a ghazi.[18]

Turkification and cultural assimilation

In both the Golden Horde and Chagatai Khanate cases, the Turkification and development of Turco-Persian tradition existed, but with a rather different process. This is due to, according from Soviet Mongolist Boris Vladimirtsov, who emphasized that "the Mongols who moved westward were quickly Turkified and generally assimilated into the surrounding ethnographic environment, which was more or less akin to them." However, he added that in northern Central Asia the process of adopting "Muslim" culture by the Mongols proceeded more slowly than in Persia and the Central Asian heartland of Transoxiana, Khorasan, Khwarazm, and Tarim Basin, due to their close proximity to other ethnically related Turkic nomads.[19]

Golden Horde

In the Golden Horde, especially during the reign of Özbeg Khan, a significant process of Turkification occurred among the Mongols living in the ulus. The secretary of the Egyptian sultan, Ibn Fadlallah al-Umari, explicitly described this process, stating:

"In ancient times, this state (the Golden Horde) was the land of the Kipchaks, but when it was conquered by the Tatars, the Kipchaks became their subjects. Later, as the Tatars intermingled and intermarried with them, the land itself overcame the original qualities and racial characteristics of the Tatars. All of them became exactly like Kipchaks, as if they were of the same stock. The Mongols settled in the land of the Kipchaks and remained there among them. Thus, long habitation in a land alters human nature and changes one's inherent features according to the nature of the country, as we said before."[20][21]

A similar perspective was expressed in the 18th century by Johann Eberhard Fischer, who described the Tatars as "the most populous among all Turkic peoples," and explained:

"That the name 'Tatar' later prevailed and became confused with the Mongols may be due to the fact that the Tatars, after being united under Genghis Khan's rule, served in his and his successors' armies in much greater numbers than the Mongols themselves. This can be concluded from the fact that in all those conquered lands, which previously had their own languages and were unfamiliar with either the Mongol or Tatar tongues, only the Tatar language came into use, while Mongolian disappeared. This would not have happened if the Tatars had not greatly outnumbered the Mongols."[22]

However, as Vladimirtsov had alluded, the Golden Horde was too far away from many main Islamic centres, and thus, despite adoption of Islam, their Islam had proven not as strictly connected to wider Islam seen among the rivalling Turkic groups like Oghuz and Karluks, and more influenced by Mongol elements instead.[23][24][25] This ultimately resulted in the Kipchaks being the most Turco-Mongolised people and the strongest embodiment of Turco-Mongol legacies within the Turkic world; later dispersal caused their Islamic adaption to be altered to whatever the environments required them later on, and even incorporating other beliefs like Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodox Christianity, Confucianism, and Tibetan Buddhism alongside their dominant Hanafi school of Islam; which had prevented the Turco-Persian tradition from taking a deeper and stronger institutional role compared to that of Oghuz and Karluk groups.[26][27][28][29]

Chagatai Khanate

This is especially strong among successors of Chagatai Khanate, as these Turco-Mongol elites of Karluk ethnicities became patrons of the Turco-Persian tradition, which was the predominant culture amongst the Muslims of the Central Asian heartland at the time. In subsequent centuries, the Turco-Persian culture was carried on further by the conquering Turco-Mongols to neighbouring regions, eventually becoming the predominant culture of a good part of the ruling and elite classes of South Asia, specifically North India, Central Asia and the Tarim Basin (Northwest China) and large parts of West Asia (Middle East).[11] Numerous entities like the Timurid Empire, Mughal Empire and Altishahr Moghulistan, Turpan Khanate and Yarkent Khanate were the products of this Turkification and Turco-Persianate court traditions among these Mongols.[30][31][32][3][4]

Impressively, this process did not even exist only among the Karluks, but also appeared among the Kipchak-born Shaybanids and Janids, who expelled the Timurids in 1507 to control the Central Asian heartland as the Khanate of Bukhara, only to enter the reversed Karlukification in process before ultimately saw themselves as heirs and developers of Timurid civilisation, and reconciled with the Mughals in India, forging the modern identities of Uzbek, Uyghur people and numerous Central and South Asian Muslim groups, all with partial Mongol links but too deeply embedded with the Turco-Persianate legacies than with that of Mongol one.[33][34][35]

See also

Citations

References

  1. ^ Beatrice Forbes Manz (1989). The Rise and Rule of Tamerlane. Cambridge University Press. pp. 6–9. ISBN 978-0-521-34595-8.
  2. ^ Lee 2019, p. 2: "Seen from a broader perspective, the Kazakhs belonged to the Chinggisid uluses, others being the Shibanid Uzbeks, Crimean Tatars, Manghits/Noghays, and Chaghatays (Moghuls and Timurids), who shared a common language (Turkic), political ideology (based on Mongol traditions), royal lineage (Chinggisid related), ethnic identity (“Mongol Turks” [Turk-i mughūl]), and religion (Sunni Islam), and who still dominated much of the vast region stretching from the Crimea in the west to the Tien Shan Mountains in the east, and from southern Siberia in the north to northern India in the south during the post-Mongol period"
  3. ^ a b c "Timur". Encyclopædia Britannica (Online Academic ed.). 2007.
  4. ^ a b c Beatrice F. Manz (2000). "Tīmūr Lang". Encyclopaedia of Islam. Vol. 10 (2nd ed.). Brill. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  5. ^ "The Cambridge History of Egypt", Volume 1, (1998) P. 250
  6. ^ "Mamluk | Islamic dynasty". Encyclopædia Britannica. 30 November 2023.
  7. ^ "Egypt – The Mamluks, 1250–1517". Country Studies US. Archived from the original on 8 April 2016. Retrieved 13 November 2015.
  8. ^ Kenneth M. Setton (1969). The Later Crusades, 1189–1311. Wisconsin: Univ of Wisconsin Press. p. 757. ISBN 978-0-299-04844-0.
  9. ^ Amalia Levanoni (1995). A Turning Point in Mamluk History: The Third Reign of Al-Nāṣir Muḥammad Ibn Qalāwūn (1310–1341). BRILL. p. 17. ISBN 9004101829. Archived from the original on 26 July 2023. Retrieved 3 October 2020.
  10. ^ Carole Hillenbrand (2007). Turkish Myth and Muslim Symbol: The Battle of Manzikert. Edimburgo: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 164–165. ISBN 9780748625727.
  11. ^ a b Canfield, Robert L. (1991). Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. p. 1 ("Origins"). ISBN 0-521-52291-9.
  12. ^ a b c Janhunen, Juha (2013). "Personal pronouns in Core Altaic". In Martine Irma Robbeets; Hubert Cuyckens (eds.). Shared Grammaticalization: With Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages. John Benjamins. p. 221. ISBN 9789027205995. Archived from the original on 26 July 2023. Retrieved 29 April 2017.
  13. ^ Nakashima, Y. (n.d.). 語彙借用に見るモンゴル語とチュルク語の言語接触: 特にカザフ語及びトゥヴァ語との比較を中心として(Rep.). Retrieved from PDF (ir.library.osaka-u.ac.jp). Archived 5 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine.
  14. ^ Halperin, Charles J. (1987). Russia and the Golden Horde: The Mongol Impact on Medieval Russian History. Indiana University Press. p. 111. ISBN 978-0-253-20445-5.
  15. ^ "Encyclopædia Britannica". Archived from the original on 9 March 2020. Retrieved 17 September 2019.
  16. ^ L.A. Grenoble (2006). Language Policy in the Soviet Union. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 149–. ISBN 978-0-306-48083-6.
  17. ^ Saunders, J. J. (2001). The History of the Mongol Conquests. University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 173–. ISBN 978-0-8122-1766-7. Archived from the original on 26 July 2023. Retrieved 3 October 2020.
  18. ^ Marozzi, Justin (2004). Tamerlane: Sword of Islam, conqueror of the world. HarperCollins.[ISBN missing]
  19. ^ Vladimirtsov, Boris Yakovlevich (1934). The Social System of the Mongols. Leningrad. p. 125.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  20. ^ al-Umari (1348). Masalik al-Absar fi Mamalik al-Amsar [The Pathways of Vision in the Realms of the Kingdoms]. Cairo. Translation cited in "Sbornik materialov", p. 250–251
  21. ^ "On the Origin and Composition of the Uzbeks of Shaybani Khan". Academy of Sciences of the Tajik SSR. 1953. Archived from the original on 3 March 2012. Retrieved 31 July 2025.
  22. ^ Fischer, Johann Eberhard (1768). History of Siberia. St. Petersburg. pp. 89–90.
  23. ^ "The culture of the Golden Horde period. States and peoples of the Eurasian Steppes - KIPCHAKS" (in Russian). 26 November 2025. Retrieved 6 March 2026.
  24. ^ Beylur, Suat; Суат, Бейлур (8 October 2024). ""Turks, Tatars and Russians in the 13th–16th centuries": exploring the interaction across Eurasia". Golden Horde Review. 12 (3): 699–708. doi:10.22378/2313-6197.2024-12-3.699-708. ISSN 2313-6197.
  25. ^ Islamic Civilization Archived 2008-05-12 at the Wayback Machine
  26. ^ "Islamization and Native Religion in the Golden Horde: Baba Tükles and Conversion to Islam in Historical and Epic Tradition By Devin DeWeese". www.psupress.org. Retrieved 22 February 2026.
  27. ^ "An Islamicate Body: A Case Study of a Nomadic Burial from the Core Territory of the Golden Horde". journals.openedition.org. Retrieved 22 February 2026.
  28. ^ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368124447_Islam_in_the_Golden_Horde_spread_and_impact_on_the_Eurasian_steppe
  29. ^ "The Role of Religion in Shaping the Socio-Cultural Identity of the Kyrgyz and Kazakhs" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 June 2025.
  30. ^ Balabanlilar, Lisa (1 January 2007). "Lords of the Auspicious Conjunction: Turco-Mongol Imperial Identity on the Subcontinent". Journal of World History. doi:10.1353/JWH.2007.0000.
  31. ^ Soucek, Svat (2000). A History of Inner Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-65169-1.
  32. ^ Ibragimova, Maftuna Abdulazizovna (30 May 2025). "Ethnographic Insights Into Central Asian History From "Devonu Lug'Otit Turk"". Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Fundamentals. 5 (05): 148–151. ISSN 2748-9345.
  33. ^ Soucek, Svat, ed. (2000), "The Shaybanids", A History of Inner Asia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–161, ISBN 978-0-521-65704-4, retrieved 6 March 2026{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  34. ^ bluedomes (13 February 2020). "The Shaybanids, Central Asia's last great dynasty". Blue Domes. Retrieved 6 March 2026.
  35. ^ Comstock-Skipp, Jaimee. "Heroes of Legend, Heroes of History: Militant Manuscripts of the Shaybanid Uzbeks in Transoxiana". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)