Sõda

MEEDIAVALVUR: algab „sõjalise erioperatsiooni“ teine etapp nimega „SÕDA“

    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Reason: Lots of partisan editing. Examples of weasel words throughout. Reads more like an argument for it at times rather than an explanation of it. With the theory arguably being tested in real life fight now, I can imagine this page could use some protection for a while.

    Temporary protection: Requesting ECP, ARBPIA-related, IP changing birthplace from Israel to Palestine with no sources, only thing the IP is doing. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 22:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 23:37, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A00:23C7:A000:0:0:0:0:0/36 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ed Johnston. for 72 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent vandalism Ghebreigzabhier | ገብረግዛብሄር | Ⲅⲉⲃⲣⲉⲓⲅⲍⲁⲃⲓⲉⲣ | عبد المسيح 01:57, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 16:25, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent vandalism Ghebreigzabhier | ገብረግዛብሄር | Ⲅⲉⲃⲣⲉⲓⲅⲍⲁⲃⲓⲉⲣ | عبد المسيح 01:57, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 16:26, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent vandalism, requesting autoconfirmed protection Ghebreigzabhier | ገብረግዛብሄር | Ⲅⲉⲃⲣⲉⲓⲅⲍⲁⲃⲓⲉⲣ | عبد المسيح 01:58, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violations since 14:58, 11 February 2025. Alith Anar 04:06, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP accounts. Ayaltimo (talk) 05:22, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry/LTA (via Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zjholder). Magitroopa (talk) 05:56, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruptions for a newly released film. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:27, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent multiple IP vandalism, most re: Gulf of Mexico vs America. BilCat (talk) 06:28, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Not sure about this one because it's only partially in the relevant sanctions area, but the page has become relevant to WP:ARBPIA and should probably be ECP. Smallangryplanet (talk) 08:53, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 12:10, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 13:51, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Highly Visible Page, no need to move. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 14:02, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Is there somesort of problem here? Moxy🍁 16:43, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent vandalism. You'd think this would be an uncontroversial article, but for whatever reason, as soon as the page protection gets lifted the IP vandalism starts up again. Several times this has happened, protection for months, years even, then as soon as it's lifted the vandalism resumes. Request indefinite semi-protection. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 14:21, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Loafiewa (talk) 14:27, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 14:28, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Per the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moeed Pirzada (2nd nomination). Repeated creations by autoconfirmed SPAs. Badbluebus (talk) 14:35, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article having some very odd edits as of late. Moxy🍁 15:04, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 15:33, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent promo additions by IPs and by a COI-declared editor. See history. Janhrach (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Moxy🍁 17:18, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:20, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: A pro-Russia user keeps editing the page and removing information about the disputed political situation. Theaang (talk) 17:51, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    The consensus has been achieved on the Talk page of the article on the topic of whose picture should be added in the infobox one month ago. You can see here. Then, I said one month ago that I would wait for other users to express opinion too, after which the consensus has only solidified on the Talk page. Therefore, I have made the article in line with consensus, but have been overriden by IP user and the new account multiple times (1, 2, 3, 4)without any reasoning, ignoring Talk page discussion and consensus. Please, add the protection to the page so only extended-confirmed users can edit it for some time. Rutdam (talk) 18:34, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Another attempt to recreate a page for JioStar despite the numerous discussions on the Disney Star page where there is no consensus to do so. This was done today by another SPI and been ongoing since November 2024. CNMall41 (talk) 18:32, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: IP vandalism CatchMe (talk · contribs) 19:25, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP-hopper from Germany continually trying to add full name with no reliable sources. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    No protection: No longer necessary. 1250metersdeep (talk) 17:33, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

    Kommenteeri