The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vamsidhar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article about a person with unclear notability Beagel (talk) 18:23, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - poorly sourced (and written), does not seem to pass WP:POLITICIAN or the general notability guidelines. Possible conflict of interest given the username of the creator.--Boffob (talk) 18:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• delete Not notable at all, and the article is awfully written with poor markup. Rtyq2 (talk) 18:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• delete not notable, bad written! abf /talk to me/ 19:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete:No notability whatsoever. Winner of some unknown award .--Deepak D'Souza 05:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.