The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

United Britain Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing any coverage (let alone significant coverage). Googling "United Britain Party" -wikipedia literally returns No results found for "United Britain Party" -wikipedia.. The only mention I can find is their own (Google Sites!) website, which obviously is not helpful for GNG purposes. HouseBlaster^talk 18:31, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United Kingdom. HouseBlaster^talk 18:31, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Wikipedia is not the place to advertise your fringe political party that is going to get 3 votes. No significant coverage of this party exists, obviously. Curbon7 (talk) 19:10, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete my own searches to show independent reliable sources to verify its existence seem lacking, let alone pass the GNG. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 08:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - this feels like it was created to advertise this fringe extremist party WesSirius (talk) 19:16, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No signs of notability. Lots of political parties are "formed", but make no impact so its existence does not automatically mean it needs an article. Dunarc (talk) 23:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above lacks indepth sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:08, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Zero sources found, literally nothing at all. Fringe party. Long way from GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 03:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - literally found 10 days ago, so ongoing coverage is going to be scant. WP:TOOSOON, WP:HAMMER, and WP:NEO apply, too. Bearian (talk) 17:08, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of the above comments; the article currently fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:42, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Lack of good sources; just founded. /Julle (talk) 12:54, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not yet enough WP:SIGCOV by reliable independent sources to establish notability and satisfy WP:GNG. Shawn Teller (talk) 16:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all sources in the article are their own Google Site, so not independent, and a Google search turns up nothing else. Maybe in a year or two if news starts talking about them, but it's WP:TOOSOON for that. Highway 89 (talk) 22:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.