The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. kurykh 00:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tosca Teran (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Not notable - very minor artist Pince Nez (talk) 06:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and when the editor who created the article has not worked on a single other article, it always suggests vanity to me... Pince Nez (talk) 06:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Looks fairly NN, google comes back with the artist's personal website and not much else. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 06:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, couldn't find any sources. By the way, what exactly makes someone a new media? 0 Mgm|^(talk) 09:17, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 10:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 10:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable with no third-party sources. freshacconci talktalk 10:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails basically our notabillity criteria. abf /talk to me/ 13:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above...Modernist (talk) 15:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.