The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 22:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Is Music Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of meeting WP:CORP; article created by an employee; tagged for notability since 2010. 2018 proposed deletion contested with rationale "has some rs" but that's not true: three of the cited sources are non-independent and the fourth is not significant. Jfire (talk) 19:12, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Companies. Jfire (talk) 19:12, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:52, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm unable to locate any sources containing significant in-depth "Independent Content" about the company. Topic fails GNG/NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.