The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:05, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Perfect 10 (NFL film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability DonaldD23 talk to me 20:51, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, American football, and United States of America. DonaldD23 talk to me 20:51, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Fox is not an independent source since the film is being presented by them. That said, my searches do turn up ample independent coverage, including Ebony, Heisman.com, Deadline.com, USA Today, Cleveland Plain Dealer, Masslive.com, Detroit Free Press, and Multichannel News. Cbl62 (talk) 23:30, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Cbl62's sources show this meets GNG and there is no notability issue. Rlendog (talk) 00:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes GNG with the sources found by Cbl62. Alvaldi (talk) 14:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I believe this has SIGCOV and passes GNG based on the sources found. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:50, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:HEY by Cbl62.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.