The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Darksword. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 12:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simkin (character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of Darksword through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the coverage in the main article is enough detail on the character. TTN (talk) 01:10, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect Already covered here. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:14, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect If for no other reason than to eliminate the plot summary at the beginning of every characters individual biography. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:54, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect to series article per nom, where the character is already covered. – sgeureka ^t•c 12:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. Eusebeus (talk) 00:25, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:56, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep presented as a key character through the game. I see very little in the way of plot details, and what is there is sourced to the work itself, the most reliable source. Conceivably merge, if there were some way of guaranteeing the information could be kept. DGG (talk) 08:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.