- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sachem's Head Yacht Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable club that fails WP:GNG. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 16:58, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 16:58, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:SIRS Rhadow (talk) 22:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete It does not meet WP:SIRS or WP:GNG guidelines. Charsaddian (talk) 08:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete in accord with all of the above. I would also add 2 points: (1) there is insufficient sourcing much more generally, and (2) that certain articles just don't meet my lax own standards - in this case, private clubs must be proven notable by specific kinds of evidence. Bearian (talk) 17:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete We would need to see a lot more to show this private yacht club meets GNG. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:16, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.